Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I hope FancyZones can work on multi-screen #2123

Closed
g82tt opened this issue Apr 14, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

I hope FancyZones can work on multi-screen #2123

g82tt opened this issue Apr 14, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
Area-OOBE First time run experience for users Product-FancyZones Refers to the FancyZones PowerToy Resolution-Duplicate There's another issue on the tracker that's pretty much the same thing.

Comments

@g82tt
Copy link

g82tt commented Apr 14, 2020

Summary of the new feature/enhancement

I hope FancyZones can work on multi-screen.
It's very usefully

@enricogior
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @g82tt
it does already work on multi monitor.
We know the out of box experience is not very good to help figuring out how to apply zonesets on the secondary monitors.
Move the mouse to the second monitor and use the hotkey to open the editor.

@crutkas
Copy link
Member

crutkas commented Apr 14, 2020

#1285 is where we'll be tracking improved out of box experience.

@crutkas crutkas closed this as completed Apr 14, 2020
@crutkas
Copy link
Member

crutkas commented Apr 14, 2020

#1032 for improved v2 editor support for Fancy Zones

@crutkas crutkas added Area-OOBE First time run experience for users Product-FancyZones Refers to the FancyZones PowerToy Resolution-Duplicate There's another issue on the tracker that's pretty much the same thing. labels Apr 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area-OOBE First time run experience for users Product-FancyZones Refers to the FancyZones PowerToy Resolution-Duplicate There's another issue on the tracker that's pretty much the same thing.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants