We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In 2020, there was a comment that @shiyu1994 plans to implement symmetric trees similar to LightGBM. Was it done? Any experiments I can look at?
Symmetric trees could be much faster in prediction time, and more robust for the small dataset.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@nd7141 Please check this branch, https://github.com/shiyu1994/LightGBM/tree/symmetric-tree-new But we haven't done anything to speedup the prediction time for symmetric trees. So far we treat it as a normal tree when prediction. Symmetric tree will be included in our next release.
Sorry, something went wrong.
To use symmetric tree, please specify symmetric_tree=true force_col_wise=true and specify a positive max_depth value.
symmetric_tree=true
force_col_wise=true
max_depth
any progress on this issue?
Hi, any progress? :)
No branches or pull requests
Summary
In 2020, there was a comment that @shiyu1994 plans to implement symmetric trees similar to LightGBM. Was it done? Any experiments I can look at?
Motivation
Symmetric trees could be much faster in prediction time, and more robust for the small dataset.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: