-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 622
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BC Idea]: Enable connector with Tietoevry for E-Documents #27057
Comments
How can I assign this issue to me? |
Done 🚀 |
PR commited. As agreed objects are with temporary id's. |
New PR #27626.. |
@Groenbech96 As agreed, I closed my first PR and created a new base on pulled code from your branch. Now I'm having issues with creating the PR... |
@Roglar01 I pinged @JesperSchulz to help us fix it :) |
@Roglar01, could you explain what issue you're facing? Which error message are you getting? I'd love to help! |
Somehow the issue is now linked to the new PR. My current problem is that you keep changing the e-Document Core.. |
Seems a little hard to get anywhere with this, when you keep changing the core for us creating e-Doc Connectors ;-(
|
The issue is linked to both the abandoned and the new PR - and that should be fine. We can unlink it to the abandoned one, but it's not necessary. Work item validation in your new PR succeeded, so all is good. For the compilation challenges, I will bring @Groenbech96 back in the discussion, as I'm not involved in the development of e-documents. |
@Roglar01 Lets take the conversation on the PR. Then we dont have multiple places of communication. You will need to uptake these changes. Other connectors needed them. Unless someone else asks for changes, they should be locked in. So that will fix that build error. |
BC Idea Link
https://experience.dynamics.com/ideas/idea/?ideaid=a78a8d27-ed2c-ef11-840a-6045bddca9de
Description
It will be good to have connector with Tietoevry service in E-Documents framework, so it will offer more electronic invoicing services as a choice for users.
I will provide the implementation for this BC Idea
Internal work item: AB#541808
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: