Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BC Idea]: Enable connector with Tietoevry for E-Documents #27057

Open
1 task done
JesperSchulz opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 11 comments · May be fixed by #27626
Open
1 task done

[BC Idea]: Enable connector with Tietoevry for E-Documents #27057

JesperSchulz opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 11 comments · May be fixed by #27626
Assignees
Labels
approved The issue is approved bcidea Issue is created based on a BC Idea Integration GitHub request for Integration area linked Issue is linked to a Azure Boards work item

Comments

@JesperSchulz
Copy link
Contributor

JesperSchulz commented Aug 15, 2024

BC Idea Link

https://experience.dynamics.com/ideas/idea/?ideaid=a78a8d27-ed2c-ef11-840a-6045bddca9de

Description

It will be good to have connector with Tietoevry service in E-Documents framework, so it will offer more electronic invoicing services as a choice for users.

I will provide the implementation for this BC Idea

  • I will provide the implementation for this BC Idea
    Internal work item: AB#541808
@JesperSchulz JesperSchulz added bcidea Issue is created based on a BC Idea approved The issue is approved Integration GitHub request for Integration area labels Aug 15, 2024
@bcbuild-github-agent bcbuild-github-agent added the linked Issue is linked to a Azure Boards work item label Aug 15, 2024
@Roglar01
Copy link

How can I assign this issue to me?

@JesperSchulz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done 🚀

@Roglar01
Copy link

PR commited. As agreed objects are with temporary id's.

@Roglar01 Roglar01 linked a pull request Nov 13, 2024 that will close this issue
@Roglar01
Copy link

New PR #27626..

@Roglar01
Copy link

@Groenbech96 As agreed, I closed my first PR and created a new base on pulled code from your branch. Now I'm having issues with creating the PR...

@Groenbech96
Copy link
Contributor

@Roglar01 I pinged @JesperSchulz to help us fix it :)

@JesperSchulz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Roglar01, could you explain what issue you're facing? Which error message are you getting? I'd love to help!

@Roglar01
Copy link

Somehow the issue is now linked to the new PR. My current problem is that you keep changing the e-Document Core..

@Roglar01
Copy link

Seems a little hard to get anywhere with this, when you keep changing the core for us creating e-Doc Connectors ;-(

Warning: AL0432 Enum 'E-Document Integration' is marked for removal. Reason: Use sender, receiver and action integration enums instead. Tag: 26.0. Warning: AL0432 Interface 'E-Document Integration' is marked for removal. Reason: This interface is obsolete. Use Send, Receive and "Default Int. Actions" interfaces instead.. Tag: 26.0. Warning: AL0432 Method 'OnAfterInsertImportedEdocument' is marked for removal. Reason: This event is removed. Use new IDocumentReceiver interface instead. Tag: 26.0. Error: AL0185 Table 'Service Participant' is missing Error: AL0185 Table 'Service Participant' is missing Error: AL0185 Table 'Service Participant' is missing Error: AL0185 Table 'Service Participant' is missing Error: AL0118 The name '"Service Participant"' does not exist in the current context. Error: AL0185 Table 'Service Participant' is missing Error: AL0185 Table 'Service Participant' is missing Error: AL0185 Table 'Service Participant' is missing

@JesperSchulz
Copy link
Contributor Author

The issue is linked to both the abandoned and the new PR - and that should be fine. We can unlink it to the abandoned one, but it's not necessary. Work item validation in your new PR succeeded, so all is good.

For the compilation challenges, I will bring @Groenbech96 back in the discussion, as I'm not involved in the development of e-documents.

@Groenbech96
Copy link
Contributor

@Roglar01 Lets take the conversation on the PR. Then we dont have multiple places of communication.

You will need to uptake these changes. Other connectors needed them. Unless someone else asks for changes, they should be locked in.
Service participant is under the namespace
Microsoft.eServices.EDocument.Service.Participant;

So that will fix that build error.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved The issue is approved bcidea Issue is created based on a BC Idea Integration GitHub request for Integration area linked Issue is linked to a Azure Boards work item
Projects
None yet
4 participants