Crossplane allows you to manage infrastructure directly from Kubernetes. Each infrastructure API resource that Crossplane orchestrates is known as a "managed resource". This guide will walk through the process of adding support for a new kind of managed resource to a Crossplane Provider.
You can watch TBS Episode 18 to follow along the live implementation of GCP PubSub managed resource.
If there is a corresponding Terraform Provider, please consider generating a Crossplane Provider with Upjet by following the Generating a Crossplane Provider guide.
If you plan to implement a managed resource for AWS, please see the code generation guide.
Crossplane builds atop Kubernetes's powerful architecture in which declarative configuration, known as resources, are continually 'reconciled' with reality by one or more controllers. A controller is an endless loop that:
- Observes the desired state (the declarative configuration resource).
- Observes the actual state (the thing said configuration resource represents).
- Tries to make the actual state match the desired state.
Typical Crossplane managed infrastructure consists of two configuration resources and one controller. The GCP Provider's support for Google Cloud Memorystore illustrates this. First, the configuration resources:
- A managed resource. Managed resources are cluster scoped, high-fidelity
representations of a resource in an external system such as a cloud
provider's API. Managed resources are non-portable across external systems
(i.e. cloud providers); they're tightly coupled to the implementation details
of the external resource they represent. Managed resources are defined by a
Provider. The GCP Provider's
CloudMemorystoreInstance
resource is an example of a managed resource. - A provider. Providers enable access to an external system, typically by
indicating a Kubernetes Secret containing any credentials required to
authenticate to the system, as well as any other metadata required to
connect. Providers are cluster scoped, like managed resources and classes.
The GCP
ProviderConfig
is an example of a provider. Note that provider is a somewhat overloaded term in the Crossplane ecosystem - it's also used to refer to the controller manager for a particular cloud, for exampleprovider-gcp
.
A managed resource is powered by a controller. This controller is responsible
for taking instances of the aforementioned high-fidelity managed resource kind
and reconciling them with an external system. The CloudMemorystoreInstance
controller watches for changes to CloudMemorystoreInstance
resources and calls
Google's Cloud Memorystore API to create, update, or delete an instance as
necessary.
Crossplane does not require controllers to be written in any particular language. The Kubernetes API server is our API boundary, so any process capable of watching the API server and updating resources can be a Crossplane controller.
At the time of writing all Crossplane Services controllers are written in Go, and built using crossplane-runtime. While it is possible to write a controller using any language and tooling with a Kubernetes client this set of tools are the "golden path". They're well supported, broadly used, and provide a shared language with the Crossplane community. This guide targets crossplane-runtime v0.9.0. It assumes the reader is familiar with the Kubernetes API Conventions and the kubebuilder book.
If you are building a new provider from scratch, instead of adding new resources to an already existing one, please use provider-template repository as a template by hitting the
Use this template
button in GitHub UI. It codifies most of the best practices used by the Crossplane community so far and is the easiest way to start a new provider.
Let's assume we want to add Crossplane support for your favourite cloud's
database-as-a-service. Your favourite cloud brands these instances as "Favourite
DB instances". Under the hood they're powered by the open source FancySQL
engine. We'll name the new managed resource kind FavouriteDBInstance
.
The first step toward implementing a new managed service is to define the code level schema of its configuration resources. These are referred to as resources, (resource) kinds, and objects interchangeably. The kubebuilder scaffolding is a good starting point for any new Crossplane API kind.
Note that while Crossplane was originally derived from kubebuilder scaffolds its patterns have diverged somewhat. It is possible to use kubebuilder to scaffold a resource, but the author must be careful to adapt said resource to Crossplane patterns. It may often be quicker to copy and modify a v1beta1 or above resource from the same provider repository, rather than using kubebuilder.
kubebuilder create api \
--group example --version v1alpha1 --kind FavouriteDBInstance \
--resource=true --controller=false --namespaced=false
The above command should produce a scaffold similar to the below example:
type FavouriteDBInstanceSpec struct {
// INSERT ADDITIONAL SPEC FIELDS - desired state of infrastructure
// Important: Run "make" to regenerate code after modifying this file
}
// FavouriteDBInstanceStatus defines the observed state of FavouriteDBInstance
type FavouriteDBInstanceStatus struct {
// INSERT ADDITIONAL STATUS FIELD - define observed state of infrastructure
// Important: Run "make" to regenerate code after modifying this file
}
// +kubebuilder:object:root=true
// FavouriteDBInstance is the Schema for the favouritedbinstance API
// +kubebuilder:resource:scope=Cluster
type FavouriteDBInstance struct {
metav1.TypeMeta `json:",inline"`
metav1.ObjectMeta `json:"metadata,omitempty"`
Spec FavouriteDBInstanceeSpec `json:"spec,omitempty"`
Status FavouriteDBInstanceStatus `json:"status,omitempty"`
}
Crossplane requires that these newly generated API type scaffolds be extended
with a set of struct fields, getters, and setters that are standard to all
Crossplane resource kinds. The getters and setter methods required to satisfy
crossplane-runtime interfaces are omitted from the below examples for brevity.
They can be added by hand, but new services are encouraged to use angryjet
to generate them automatically using a //go:generate
comment per the
angryjet
documentation.
Note that in many cases a suitable provider will already exist. Frequently adding support for a new managed service requires only the definition of the managed resource itself.
Managed resources must:
- Satisfy crossplane-runtime's
resource.Managed
interface. - Embed a
ResourceStatus
struct in theirStatus
struct. - Embed a
ResourceSpec
struct in theirSpec
struct. - Embed a
Parameters
struct in theirSpec
struct. - Use the
+kubebuilder:subresource:status
comment marker. - Use the
+kubebuilder:resource:scope=Cluster
comment marker.
The Parameters
struct should be a high fidelity representation of the
writeable fields of the external resource's API. Put otherwise, if your
favourite cloud represents Favourite DB instances as a JSON object then
FavouriteDBParameters
should marshal to a something as close to that JSON
object as possible while still complying with Kubernetes API conventions.
For example, assume the external API object for Favourite DB instance was:
{
"id": 42,
"name": "mycoolinstance",
"fanciness_level": 100,
"version": "2.3",
"status": "ONLINE",
"hostname": "cool.fcp.example.org"
}
Further assume the id
, status
, and hostname
fields were output only, and
the version
field was optional. The FavouriteDBInstance
managed resource
should look as follows:
// FavouriteDBInstanceParameters define the desired state of an FavouriteDB
// instance. Most fields map directly to an Instance:
// https://favourite.example.org/api/v1/db#Instance
type FavouriteDBInstanceParameters struct {
// We're still working on a standard for naming external resources. See
// https://github.com/crossplane/crossplane/issues/624 for context.
// Name of this instance.
Name string `json:"name"`
// Note that fanciness_level becomes fancinessLevel below. Kubernetes API
// conventions trump cloud provider fidelity.
// FancinessLevel specifies exactly how fancy this instance is.
FancinessLevel int `json:"fancinessLevel"`
// Version specifies what version of FancySQL this instance will run.
// +optional
Version *string `json:"version,omitempty"`
}
// A FavouriteDBInstanceSpec defines the desired state of a FavouriteDBInstance.
type FavouriteDBInstanceSpec struct {
xpv1.ResourceSpec `json:",inline"`
ForProvider FavouriteDBInstanceParameters `json:"forProvider"`
}
// A FavouriteDBInstanceStatus represents the observed state of a
// FavouriteDBInstance.
type FavouriteDBInstanceStatus struct {
xpv1.ResourceStatus `json:",inline"`
// Note that we add the three "output only" fields here in the status,
// instead of the parameters. We want this representation to be high
// fidelity just like the parameters.
// ID of this instance.
ID int `json:"id,omitempty"`
// Status of this instance.
Status string `json:"status,omitempty"`
// Hostname of this instance.
Hostname string `json:"hostname,omitempty"`
}
// A FavouriteDBInstance is a managed resource that represents a Favourite DB
// instance.
// +kubebuilder:subresource:status
type FavouriteDBInstance struct {
metav1.TypeMeta `json:",inline"`
metav1.ObjectMeta `json:"metadata,omitempty"`
Spec FavouriteDBInstanceSpec `json:"spec"`
Status FavouriteDBInstanceStatus `json:"status,omitempty"`
}
Note that Crossplane uses the GoDoc strings of API kinds to generate user facing
API documentation. Document all fields and prefer GoDoc that assumes the
reader is running kubectl explain
, or reading an API reference, not reading
the code. Refer to the Managed Resource API Patterns one pager for more detail
on authoring high fidelity managed resources.
You'll typically only need to add a new Provider kind if you're creating an infrastructure provider that adds support for a new infrastructure provider.
Providers must:
- Be named exactly
ProviderConfig
. - Embed a
ProviderSpec
struct in theirSpec
struct. - Use the
+kubebuilder:resource:scope=Cluster
comment marker.
The Favourite Cloud ProviderConfig
would look as follows. Note that the cloud to
which it belongs should be indicated by its API group, i.e. its API Version
would be favouritecloud.crossplane.io/v1alpha1
or similar.
// A ProviderSpec defines the desired state of a Provider.
type ProviderSpec struct {
xpv1.ProviderSpec `json:",inline"`
// Information required outside of the Secret referenced in the embedded
// xpv1.ProviderSpec that is required to authenticate to the provider.
// ProjectID is used as an example here.
ProjectID string `json:"projectID"`
}
// A Provider configures a Favourite Cloud 'provider', i.e. a connection to a
// particular Favourite Cloud project using a particular Favourite Cloud service
// account.
type Provider struct {
metav1.TypeMeta `json:",inline"`
metav1.ObjectMeta `json:"metadata,omitempty"`
Spec ProviderSpec `json:"spec"`
}
At this point we've defined the managed resource necessary to start building controllers. Before moving on to the controllers:
- Add any kubebuilder comment markers that may be useful for your resource.
Comment markers can be used to validate input, or add additional columns to
the standard
kubectl get
output, among other things. - Run
make reviewable
to generate Custom Resource Definitions and additional helper methods for your new resource kinds. - Make sure any package documentation (i.e.
// Package v1alpha1...
GoDoc, including package level comment markers) are in a file nameddoc.go
. kubebuilder adds them togroupversion_info.go
, but several code generation tools only checkdoc.go
.
Finally, add convenience GroupVersionKind
variables for each new resource
kind. These are typically added to either register.go
or
groupversion_info.go
depending on which version of kubebuilder scaffolded the
API type:
// FavouriteDBInstance type metadata.
var (
FavouriteDBInstanceKind = reflect.TypeOf(FavouriteDBInstance{}).Name()
FavouriteDBInstanceKindAPIVersion = FavouriteDBInstanceKind + "." + GroupVersion.String()
FavouriteDBInstanceGroupVersionKind = GroupVersion.WithKind(FavouriteDBInstanceKind)
)
Consider opening a draft pull request and asking a Crossplane maintainer for review before you start work on the controller!
Crossplane controllers, like those scaffolded by kubebuilder, are built around
the controller-runtime library. controller-runtime flavoured controllers
encapsulate most of their domain-specific logic in a reconcile.Reconciler
implementation. Most Crossplane controllers are one of the three kinds mentioned
under What Makes a Crossplane Infrastructure Resource. Each of these controller kinds
are similar enough across implementations that crossplane-runtime provides
'default' reconcilers. These reconcilers encode what the Crossplane community
has learned about managing external systems and narrow the problem space from
reconciling a Kubernetes resource kind with an arbitrary system down to
Crossplane-specific tasks.
crossplane-runtime provides the following reconcile.Reconcilers
:
- The
managed.Reconciler
reconciles managed resources with external systems by instantiating a client of the external API and using it to create, update, or delete the external resource as necessary.
Crossplane controllers typically differ sufficiently from those scaffolded by kubebuilder that there is little value in using kubebuilder to generate a controller scaffold.
Managed resource controllers should use managed.NewReconciler
to wrap a
managed-resource specific implementation of managed.ExternalConnecter
. Parts
of managed.Reconciler
's behaviour is customisable; refer to the
managed.NewReconciler
GoDoc for a list of options. The following is an
example controller for the FavouriteDBInstance
managed resource we defined
earlier:
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"strings"
"github.com/pkg/errors"
corev1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1"
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/types"
ctrl "sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime"
"sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/client"
// An API client of the hypothetical FavouriteDB service.
"github.com/fcp-sdk/v1/services/database"
xpv1 "github.com/crossplane/crossplane-runtime/apis/common/v1"
"github.com/crossplane/crossplane-runtime/pkg/meta"
"github.com/crossplane/crossplane-runtime/pkg/resource"
"github.com/crossplane/crossplane-runtime/pkg/reconciler/managed"
"github.com/crossplane/provider-fcp/apis/database/v1alpha3"
fcpv1alpha3 "github.com/crossplane/provider-fcp/apis/v1alpha3"
)
type FavouriteDBInstanceController struct{}
// SetupWithManager instantiates a new controller using a managed.Reconciler
// configured to reconcile FavouriteDBInstances using an ExternalClient produced by
// connecter, which satisfies the ExternalConnecter interface.
func (c *FavouriteDBInstanceController) SetupWithManager(mgr ctrl.Manager) error {
return ctrl.NewControllerManagedBy(mgr).
Named(strings.ToLower(fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s", v1alpha3.FavouriteDBInstanceKind, v1alpha3.Group))).
For(&v1alpha3.FavouriteDBInstance{}).
Complete(managed.NewReconciler(mgr,
resource.ManagedKind(v1alpha3.FavouriteDBInstanceGroupVersionKind),
managed.WithExternalConnecter(&connecter{client: mgr.GetClient()})))
}
// Connecter satisfies the resource.ExternalConnecter interface.
type connecter struct{ client client.Client }
// Connect to the supplied resource.Managed (presumed to be a
// FavouriteDBInstance) by using the Provider it references to create a new
// database client.
func (c *connecter) Connect(ctx context.Context, mg resource.Managed) (managed.ExternalClient, error) {
// Assert that resource.Managed we were passed in fact contains a
// FavouriteDBInstance. We told NewControllerManagedBy that this was a
// controller For FavouriteDBInstance, so something would have to go
// horribly wrong for us to encounter another type.
i, ok := mg.(*v1alpha3.FavouriteDBInstance)
if !ok {
return nil, errors.New("managed resource is not a FavouriteDBInstance")
}
// Get the Provider referenced by the FavouriteDBInstance.
p := &fcpv1alpha3.Provider{}
if err := c.client.Get(ctx, meta.NamespacedNameOf(i.Spec.ProviderReference), p); err != nil {
return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "cannot get Provider")
}
// Get the Secret referenced by the Provider.
s := &corev1.Secret{}
n := types.NamespacedName{Namespace: p.Namespace, Name: p.Spec.Secret.Name}
if err := c.client.Get(ctx, n, s); err != nil {
return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "cannot get Provider secret")
}
// Create and return a new database client using the credentials read from
// our Provider's Secret.
client, err := database.NewClient(ctx, s.Data[p.Spec.Secret.Key])
return &external{client: client}, errors.Wrap(err, "cannot create client")
}
// External satisfies the resource.ExternalClient interface.
type external struct{ client database.Client }
// Observe the existing external resource, if any. The managed.Reconciler
// calls Observe in order to determine whether an external resource needs to be
// created, updated, or deleted.
func (e *external) Observe(ctx context.Context, mg resource.Managed) (managed.ExternalObservation, error) {
i, ok := mg.(*v1alpha3.FavouriteDBInstance)
if !ok {
return managed.ExternalObservation{}, errors.New("managed resource is not a FavouriteDBInstance")
}
// Use our FavouriteDB API client to get an up to date view of the external
// resource.
existing, err := e.client.GetInstance(ctx, i.Spec.Name)
// If we encounter an error indicating the external resource does not exist
// we want to let the managed.Reconciler know so it can create it.
if database.IsNotFound(err) {
return managed.ExternalObservation{ResourceExists: false}, nil
}
// Any other errors are wrapped (as is good Go practice) and returned to the
// managed.Reconciler. It will update the "Synced" status condition
// of the managed resource to reflect that the most recent reconcile failed
// and ensure the reconcile is reattempted after a brief wait.
if err != nil {
return managed.ExternalObservation{}, errors.Wrap(err, "cannot get instance")
}
// The external resource exists. Copy any output-only fields to their
// corresponding entries in our status field.
i.Status.Status = existing.GetStatus()
i.Status.Hostname = existing.GetHostname()
i.Status.ID = existing.GetID()
// Update our "Ready" status condition to reflect the status of the external
// resource. Most managed resources use the below well known reasons that
// the "Ready" status may be true or false, but managed resource authors
// are welcome to define and use their own.
switch i.Status.Status {
case database.StatusOnline:
resource.SetBindable(i)
i.SetConditions(xpv1.Available())
case database.StatusCreating:
i.SetConditions(xpv1.Creating())
case database.StatusDeleting:
i.SetConditions(xpv1.Deleting())
}
// Finally, we report what we know about the external resource. In this
// hypothetical case FancinessLevel is the only field that can be updated
// after creation time, so the resource does not need to be updated if
// the actual fanciness level matches our desired fanciness level. Any
// ConnectionDetails we return will be published to the managed resource's
// connection secret if it specified one.
o := managed.ExternalObservation{
ResourceExists: true,
ResourceUpToDate: existing.GetFancinessLevel == i.Spec.FancinessLevel,
ConnectionDetails: managed.ConnectionDetails{
xpv1.ResourceCredentialsSecretUserKey: []byte(existing.GetUsername()),
xpv1.ResourceCredentialsSecretEndpointKey: []byte(existing.GetHostname()),
},
}
return o, nil
}
// Create a new external resource based on the specification of our managed
// resource. managed.Reconciler only calls Create if Observe reported
// that the external resource did not exist.
func (e *external) Create(ctx context.Context, mg resource.Managed) (managed.ExternalCreation, error) {
i, ok := mg.(*v1alpha3.FavouriteDBInstance)
if !ok {
return managed.ExternalCreation{}, errors.New("managed resource is not a FavouriteDBInstance")
}
// Indicate that we're about to create the instance. Remember ExternalClient
// authors can use a bespoke condition reason here in cases where Creating
// doesn't make sense.
i.SetConditions(xpv1.Creating())
// Create must return any connection details that are set or returned only
// at creation time. The managed.Reconciler will merge any details
// with those returned during the Observe phase.
password := database.GeneratePassword()
cd := managed.ConnectionDetails{xpv1.ResourceCredentialsSecretPasswordKey: []byte(password)}
// Create a new instance.
new := database.Instance{Name: i.Name, FancinessLevel: i.FancinessLevel, Version: i.Version}
err := e.client.CreateInstance(ctx, new, password)
// Note that we use resource.Ignore to squash any error that indicates the
// external resource already exists. Create implementations must not return
// an error if asked to create a resource that already exists. Real managed
// resource controllers are advised to avoid unintentially 'adoptign' an
// existing, unrelated external resource, per
// https://github.com/crossplane/crossplane-runtime/issues/27
return managed.ExternalCreation{ConnectionDetails: cd}, errors.Wrap(resource.Ignore(database.IsExists, err), "cannot create instance")
}
// Update the existing external resource to match the specifications of our
// managed resource. managed.Reconciler only calls Update if Observe
// reported that the external resource was not up to date.
func (e *external) Update(ctx context.Context, mg resource.Managed) (managed.ExternalUpdate, error) {
i, ok := mg.(*v1alpha3.FavouriteDBInstance)
if !ok {
return managed.ExternalUpdate{}, errors.New("managed resource is not a FavouriteDBInstance")
}
// Recall that FancinessLevel is the only field that we _can_ update.
new := database.Instance{Name: i.Name, FancinessLevel: i.FancinessLevel}
err := e.client.UpdateInstance(ctx, new)
return managed.ExternalUpdate{}, errors.Wrap(err, "cannot update instance")
}
// Delete the external resource. managed.Reconciler only calls Delete
// when a managed resource with the 'Delete' deletion policy (the default) has
// been deleted.
func (e *external) Delete(ctx context.Context, mg resource.Managed) error {
i, ok := mg.(*v1alpha3.FavouriteDBInstance)
if !ok {
return errors.New("managed resource is not a FavouriteDBInstance")
}
// Indicate that we're about to delete the instance.
i.SetConditions(xpv1.Deleting())
// Delete the instance.
err := e.client.DeleteInstance(ctx, i.Spec.Name)
// Note that we use resource.Ignore to squash any error that indicates the
// external resource does not exist. Delete implementations must not return
// an error when asked to delete a non-existent external resource.
return errors.Wrap(resource.Ignore(database.IsNotFound, err), "cannot delete instance")
}
Once all your controllers are in place you'll want to test them. Note that most
projects under the crossplane org favor table driven tests that use Go's
standard library testing
package over kubebuilder's Gingko based tests. Please
do not add or proliferate Gingko based tests.
Finally, don't forget to plumb any newly added resource kinds and controllers up
to your controller manager. Simple providers may do this for each type within
within main()
, but most more complicated providers take an approach in which
each package exposes an AddToScheme
(for resource kinds) or SetupWithManager
(for controllers) function that invokes the same function within its child
packages, resulting in a main.go
like:
import (
"time"
"sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/client/config"
"sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/manager"
"sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/manager/signals"
crossplaneapis "github.com/crossplane/crossplane/apis"
fcpapis "github.com/crossplane/provider-fcp/apis"
"github.com/crossplane/provider-fcp/pkg/controller"
)
func main() {
cfg, err := config.GetConfig()
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
mgr, err := manager.New(cfg, manager.Options{SyncPeriod: 1 * time.Hour})
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
if err := crossplaneapis.AddToScheme(mgr.GetScheme()); err != nil {
panic(err)
}
if err := fcpapis.AddToScheme(mgr.GetScheme()); err != nil {
panic(err)
}
if err := controller.SetupWithManager(mgr); err != nil {
panic(err)
}
panic(mgr.Start(signals.SetupSignalHandler()))
}
In this guide we walked through the process of defining the resource kinds and controllers necessary to build support for new managed infrastructure; possibly even a completely new infrastructure provider. Please do not hesitate to reach out to the Crossplane maintainers and community for help designing and implementing support for new managed services. We would highly value any feedback you may have about the development process!