-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bibliographic date for "revision" is outside of Bibdata structure #30
Comments
We left it outside of the bibdata out of a notion that the bibdata was describing the work and not the version. But that is overly scrupulous, I agree. Moving the version back into bibdata is going to require a lot of code changes. I don't even remember where the relaton writeup is, but it is going to have to be updated in light of these changes. |
The write up is at relaton-models. I believe we have bibdates within bibdata. |
We do, but the revision date should be kept separate; it does not correspond to a distinct phase of document production, but applies across any of them. |
Maybe what we need is to encode the revision dates in both — inside bibdata (the publication date) and also outside of it (as the generation date of document). At the CalConnect standards repository we’re trying to make a page for each project like the ISO site, so if we can represent a Relaton object with multiple document revisions (at different stages), we can generate a page that show standards progression and also the drafts that come with each stage. |
If it's the publication date of the document, it's covered by the existing The writeup is in fact in the ISO690 document. That document is going to have to be updated extensively. |
The representation of multiple document revisions in a single Relaton file is covered by relaton/relaton#19 |
Following metanorma/metanorma-model-iso#15 (comment), edition is now in bibdata as a separate tag, and should be removed from the version tag. |
In Metanorma XML we have the revision date outside of the
<bibdata>
structure:This makes it impossible to know the revision (and other dates) of a document from the Relaton file, we need the Metanorma file to do that.
Should this information be available within
<bibdata>
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: