Fix Utils line length #15
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
drcrallen
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2016
…gle batch
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR support multiple Python UDFs within single batch, also improve the performance.
```python
>>> from pyspark.sql.types import IntegerType
>>> sqlContext.registerFunction("double", lambda x: x * 2, IntegerType())
>>> sqlContext.registerFunction("add", lambda x, y: x + y, IntegerType())
>>> sqlContext.sql("SELECT double(add(1, 2)), add(double(2), 1)").explain(True)
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project [unresolvedalias('double('add(1, 2)), None),unresolvedalias('add('double(2), 1), None)]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
double(add(1, 2)): int, add(double(2), 1): int
Project [double(add(1, 2))#14,add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- Project [double(add(1, 2))#14,add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- EvaluatePython [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#18]
+- EvaluatePython [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
+- EvaluatePython [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#18]
+- EvaluatePython [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- OneRowRelation$
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
: +- Project [pythonUDF0#16 AS double(add(1, 2))#14,pythonUDF0#18 AS add(double(2), 1)#15]
: +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation [add(pythonUDF1#17, 1)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17,pythonUDF0#18]
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation [double(add(1, 2)),double(2)], [pythonUDF0#16,pythonUDF1#17]
+- Scan OneRowRelation[]
```
## How was this patch tested?
Added new tests.
Using the following script to benchmark 1, 2 and 3 udfs,
```
df = sqlContext.range(1, 1 << 23, 1, 4)
double = F.udf(lambda x: x * 2, LongType())
print df.select(double(df.id)).count()
print df.select(double(df.id), double(df.id + 1)).count()
print df.select(double(df.id), double(df.id + 1), double(df.id + 2)).count()
```
Here is the results:
N | Before | After | speed up
---- |------------ | -------------|------
1 | 22 s | 7 s | 3.1X
2 | 38 s | 13 s | 2.9X
3 | 58 s | 16 s | 3.6X
This benchmark ran locally with 4 CPUs. For 3 UDFs, it launched 12 Python before before this patch, 4 process after this patch. After this patch, it will use less memory for multiple UDFs than before (less buffering).
Author: Davies Liu <[email protected]>
Closes apache#12057 from davies/multi_udfs.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.