Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Align terminology with GraphQL Composite Schemas Working Group Glossary #827

Open
2 tasks
jonnydgreen opened this issue Jul 15, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks
Labels
documentation enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@jonnydgreen
Copy link
Contributor

Following on from discussions in the GraphQL Composite Schemas Working Group: https://github.com/graphql/composite-schemas-wg it would be good to align terminology.

Current working glossary: graphql/composite-schemas-wg#34

Terms agreed in the inaugural meeting in 14th July 2022:

  • Subschema - essentially the schema of a federated service (definition TBD)

Exploration

TODO:

  • Explore and identify terminology currently used in Mercurius
  • Explore and identify terminology to be updated in Mercurius to align with the WG outcomes

Potential places to look in/look out for:

  • Docs
  • Mercurius lib
  • Examples
  • Tests
  • File names

WIP

Proposed Solution

WIP

For anyone interested in helping contribute, feel free to identify and explore :)

@mcollina mcollina added good first issue Good for newcomers enhancement New feature or request documentation labels Jul 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants