You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Vocabularies do not support specifically declaring different value sets for keywords. Due to this limitation, and the historically uneven implementation of this keyword, it is RECOMMENDED to define additional keywords in a custom vocabulary rather than additional format attributes if interoperability is desired.
This means we probably should not use custom format values, but rather define custom keywords (e.g. dbtype).
Stub.
For example OpenAPI defines its own vocabulary on top of Draft 2020-12
Custom data types and formats: https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/blob/main/versions/3.1.0.md#data-types
Examples: https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/blob/main/versions/3.1.0.md#schema-object-examples
https://spec.openapis.org/oas/3.1/dialect/base
Related:
BIGINT
MeltanoLabs/target-postgres#485 (comment)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: