Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

This can get HOTA 69.9? #2

Closed
paperkaiser opened this issue Nov 21, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

This can get HOTA 69.9? #2

paperkaiser opened this issue Nov 21, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@paperkaiser
Copy link

because i look for the training steps you provided and the use of yolox ,but can't get the HOTA of 69.9 ,So I want to ask if the code you provided can get 69.9, Thanks!!!

@zyayoung
Copy link
Collaborator

This repo is theoretically the same as the one that gets 69.9 test HOTA, except some cleanups.
We do observe a relatively high instability (~2pt). Our latest run of this repo yields a 68.33 test HOTA on DanceTrack.

@paperkaiser
Copy link
Author

This repo is theoretically the same as the one that gets 69.9 test HOTA, except some cleanups. We do observe a relatively high instability (~2pt). Our latest run of this repo yields a 68.33 test HOTA on DanceTrack.

thanks for your reply!

@zyayoung
Copy link
Collaborator

the use of yolox ,but can't get the HOTA of 69.9

If you add YOLOX proposal to the original MOTR repo, you may need to modify track query filtering in QIM and tune inference hyperparameters (score threshold and miss tolerance).
You may refer to the "Implementation Details" section for details.

@wenyuqing
Copy link

This repo is theoretically the same as the one that gets 69.9 test HOTA, except some cleanups. We do observe a relatively high instability (~2pt). Our latest run of this repo yields a 68.33 test HOTA on DanceTrack.

Hi, I'm curious about what factors cause the instability as the random seed is fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants