-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 501
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
valid circuit-breaker filter spec by correlation #551
Conversation
Thanks for fixing this ^^ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #551 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 78.58% 78.51% -0.07%
==========================================
Files 94 94
Lines 10862 10878 +16
==========================================
+ Hits 8536 8541 +5
- Misses 1842 1850 +8
- Partials 484 487 +3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
* valid circuit-breaker filter spec by correlation * fix circuit-breaker filter failure legality validate * fix error message
The circuit breaker filter should valid spec according to the parameter correlation: using the strategy of failure statistics, it should ensure that the relevant required parameters have been set(failureRateThreshold,failureStatusCodes). At this time, the relevant parameters of the slow call are not required, and vice versa.