Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

table.bc code.version #1941

Closed
ghost opened this issue Dec 4, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

table.bc code.version #1941

ghost opened this issue Dec 4, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 4, 2020

Could version numbers be like code so preformatted because is common to see them in a package.json or something.

Screenshot_20201204-162325.png

@schalkneethling
Copy link

@mattiapontonio I don't believe it will make that much of a difference semantically or visually to justify adding a number of additional DOM nodes, especially on pages with a large, complex BCD table. Thoughts?

Our DOM is already pretty massive on a number of pages which is detrimental for performance.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Dec 4, 2020

@schalkneethling
Of course.
It's often a trade-off.
🤷🏻‍♂️ I don't want to force some things too much complex (expecially in this complex table), it's a ready made idea that comes some minute ago 🙂

@ghost ghost changed the title versions in BCT as code versions in table.bc as code Dec 13, 2020
@ghost ghost changed the title versions in table.bc as code table.bc code.verison Dec 13, 2020
@ghost ghost changed the title table.bc code.verison table.bc code.version Dec 13, 2020
@ghost ghost closed this as completed Jan 26, 2021
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant