You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am still fiddling around with your model, and I have a few questions for you if you could be so nice as to clarify.
One thing I noticed was that after the inference step, if I go to the AR-HMM model object and try to access the transition matrix that represents the states, I get a full transition matrix that actually has non-zero probabilities of going to states that were not in the model.stateseqs list. Both model.trans_distn.trans_matrix and model.trans_distn.full_trans_matrix are the same, even though the inference procedure "found" a number of states that were far less than Nmax.
When using the AR-HSMM model, is there a way to use the PoissonDuration as opposed to the NegativeBinomialDuration? Do you have an opinion as to what sort of prior information or intuition would lead you to use one duration distributional form versus another?
Thanks in advance,
mg
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Matt,
I am still fiddling around with your model, and I have a few questions for you if you could be so nice as to clarify.
model.stateseqs
list. Bothmodel.trans_distn.trans_matrix
andmodel.trans_distn.full_trans_matrix
are the same, even though the inference procedure "found" a number of states that were far less thanNmax
.AR-HSMM
model, is there a way to use the PoissonDuration as opposed to the NegativeBinomialDuration? Do you have an opinion as to what sort of prior information or intuition would lead you to use one duration distributional form versus another?Thanks in advance,
mg
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: