-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 279
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature Request]: LOAD INTO VALUES #9955
Labels
attention/dev-design-required
attention/doc-influence
need to complete design document
attention/needs-doc-discussion
the user behavior is not clear, documentation job cannot proceed
kind/feature
priority/p-1
source/dev
issues from devs
Milestone
Comments
So far the "format" that comes to mind are,
I think 1, 2, 3 will be great. Doing 4 is even better but optional. |
Doc related questions:
|
dengn
added
the
attention/needs-doc-discussion
the user behavior is not clear, documentation job cannot proceed
label
Jul 7, 2023
fengttt
added
the
priority/p1
Medium priority feature that should be implemented in this version
label
Jul 28, 2023
7 tasks
sukki37
added
priority/p0
Critical feature that should be implemented in this version
attention/dev-design-required
source/dev
issues from devs
and removed
priority/p1
Medium priority feature that should be implemented in this version
attention/being-discussed
features being discussed
attention/needs-doc-discussion
the user behavior is not clear, documentation job cannot proceed
labels
Aug 24, 2023
domingozhang
changed the title
[Feature Request]: INSERT INTO BIANRY VALUES
[Feature Request]: LOAD INTO VALUES
Aug 31, 2023
USE new syntax |
Current load syntax,
We pretty much want an inline file -- that is,
Or we can even overload current syntax
|
to clarify the syntax in this week. @domingozhang |
florashi181
added
priority/p-1
and removed
priority/p0
Critical feature that should be implemented in this version
labels
Sep 5, 2023
lacrimosaprinz
added
the
attention/needs-doc-discussion
the user behavior is not clear, documentation job cannot proceed
label
Sep 6, 2023
This was referenced Sep 13, 2023
This was referenced Sep 14, 2023
Completed by 11633 |
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
attention/dev-design-required
attention/doc-influence
need to complete design document
attention/needs-doc-discussion
the user behavior is not clear, documentation job cannot proceed
kind/feature
priority/p-1
source/dev
issues from devs
Is there an existing issue for the same feature request?
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Describe the feature you'd like
We can either publish protocolbuffer definition and let user serialize it, or, we can publish our own client software and
turn insert into ... values ... into insert into ... binary values ...
Our own client driver is definitely much less intrusive to customer but that means we need to fork/maintain jdbc, python client, etc. And that is intrusive in a different way.
I think protocol buffer has enough language bindings that we can simply use that. Or parquet/arrow. Note that we may need to support parquet/arrow anyway as part of external table work.
But our internal use (logging) can simply use our own batch format
Describe implementation you've considered
No response
Documentation, Adoption, Use Case, Migration Strategy
No response
Additional information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: