diff --git a/proposals/3026-presence-busy.md b/proposals/3026-presence-busy.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0a135e34f40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/proposals/3026-presence-busy.md
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+# MSC3026: `busy` presence state
+
+The current specification for [presence](https://spec.matrix.org/v1.3/client-server-api/#presence) in Matrix describes three states:
+
+* `online` if the user is online and active
+* `unavailable` (aka idle or away) if the user is online but inactive
+* `offline` if the user is offline
+
+There is currently no presence state to express that the user is online and
+active, but busy, i.e. in a state that would prevent them from giving their full
+focus to solicitations from other users. A practical example would be a user
+that's on a call with another user (or on a group call).
+
+
+## Proposal
+
+A new presence state is added, `busy`, which describes a state where the user is
+online and active but is performing an activity that would prevent them from
+giving their full attention to an external solicitation, i.e. the user is online
+and active but not available.
+
+It is left to the implementation to decide how to update a user's presence to
+the `busy` state (and from this state to another); suggestions would include
+allowing the user to set it manually, setting it automatically when the user
+joins a call or a Jitsi group call, etc..
+
+If a user's presence is set to `busy`, it is strongly recommended for
+implementations to not implement a timer that would trigger an update to the
+`unavailable` state (like most implementations do when the user is in the
+`online` state). This is because there are some valid use cases for the user not
+triggering any event in the client but still being online and active, e.g. if
+they're on a call, and because such automation while taking the specific
+semantics of the `busy` state into account is complex when the user is using
+multiple devices.
+
+For backwards compatibility, servers implementing this MSC must expose a flag in
+`/_matrix/client/versions` responses, under `unstable_features`, named
+`org.matrix.msc3026.busy_presence`, which is set to `true`. Before setting a
+user's presence to `busy`, clients must check the presence of this flag and that
+it's set to `true`. If it's not, clients should fall back to setting the user's
+presence state to `unavailable`, which is the closest state to `busy`
+semantically.
+
+
+## Potential issues
+
+It is unclear whether introducing a new presence state will break some clients
+that don't implement this MSC yet. If this happens, the mitigation is unclear
+and open to discussion.
+
+
+## Unstable prefix
+
+Until this proposal is merged into a stable version of the Matrix specification,
+implementations must use `org.matrix.msc3026.busy` instead of `busy` as the new
+presence state.