-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 214
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Accept key backups as usable if they're signed with the master cross-signing key #1492
Open
bradtgmurray
wants to merge
4
commits into
matrix-org:develop
Choose a base branch
from
bradtgmurray:accept-key-backups-signed-with-the-cross-signing-key
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8142b65
Accept key backups as usable if they're signed with the master cross-…
bradtgmurray 606ee86
Add a changelog entry
bradtgmurray 71256d0
Only accept MSK signatures, update unit test to validate
bradtgmurray 43c107e
Rename to deviceIdOrCrossSigningKey
bradtgmurray File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Accept key backups as usable if they're signed with the master cross-signing key. Contributed by Brad @ Beeper |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The existing parent
else
branch does not ensure that thedeviceId
is indeed a master key (it only mentions it in a comment), as opposed to other type of key. Could you please change theelse // Try interpreting it as the MSK public key
into something likeelse if ([deviceId isEqualToString:masterKey])
? The master key can be obtained for instance ascrypto.crossSigning.myUserCrossSigningKeys.masterKeys.keys
. See also Android implementation for reference.If the comparison check fails, we can log that as another issue.
Additionally it may be worth renaming the
deviceId
local variable intodeviceIdOrCrossSigningKey
, otherwise the name can be misleadingThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only a month and a half later I've finally addressed this feedback, thanks @Anderas !
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for making the change. I see that we will now be adding a signature object even if the master key verification did not succeed, but it will be set as invalid (plus this copies js / android behaviour) so it sounds good to me