Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

too specific lemma #1408

Closed
affeldt-aist opened this issue Nov 24, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1409
Closed

too specific lemma #1408

affeldt-aist opened this issue Nov 24, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1409
Milestone

Comments

@affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member

Lemma dynkin_setI_bigsetI G (F : (set T)^nat) : dynkin G -> setI_closed G ->

G does not need to be dynkin...

@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added this to the 1.8.0 milestone Nov 24, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist mentioned this issue Nov 24, 2024
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant