Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Determine best practices for annotating which data is connected to which figures in a paper #1403

Open
stvdwtt opened this issue May 2, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@stvdwtt
Copy link

stvdwtt commented May 2, 2019

I think a typical use case for MC is someone reads a paper and wants to learn more about the data that went into a specific figure/table. When they look at a published dataset, there should be some clear way for them to determine which experiments/samples/processes are associated with that figure/table.

I'm not sure that this requires new features, it might just be that we need to use some sort of convention.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant