You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Fieldnames of distinct microbe types should be standardized as much as possible, despite them having possibly slightly different physical meanings, e.g.:
BrownBerg and Brumley have a motor_gain field, while in Celani the equivalent field is just called gain
BrownBerg and Brumley have an adaptation_time field, while the Celani equivalent is called memory
the state field in Celani is a vector, whereas it is a scalar in BrownBerg, Brumley and Xie; it's maybe more convenient to keep it a scalar and rename the internal markovian variables to something different
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fieldnames of distinct microbe types should be standardized as much as possible, despite them having possibly slightly different physical meanings, e.g.:
BrownBerg
andBrumley
have amotor_gain
field, while inCelani
the equivalent field is just calledgain
BrownBerg
andBrumley
have anadaptation_time
field, while theCelani
equivalent is calledmemory
state
field inCelani
is a vector, whereas it is a scalar inBrownBerg
,Brumley
andXie
; it's maybe more convenient to keep it a scalar and rename the internal markovian variables to something differentThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: