-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Code blocks]: Consolidate issues #983
Comments
Josh, this means that all of these issues are still valid and unresolved, even though they are marked as "closed". Right? |
Pretty much. Given the issues span 5+ years I figured this was a good way to put them in one place to maybe put a checklist together to say, "We have tests in the current codebase that demonstrate this is no longer a problem." (I think the community was getting overwhelmed by the sheer number of open issues and maybe not knowing where to begin to contribute back.) So, if you're looking to contribute, it might be pretty simple. If there's no test to measure the validity - then, it's not resolved - so, it may be as simple as writing a test, verifying it passes, then submitting the PR. If there's a test already - then we can remove it from the reference list. Hope that makes sense. |
@mercmobily: Shorter version. I don't know if they're resolved or not. Kinda hoping the community will help out on that score. One or two people can't do all the heavy lifting...as has been evidenced. So, I'm taking a somewhat different tack with things. :) |
I'm not sure if this is helpful (and I'd be happy to delete the comment if not), but here's a base case of how marked differs from most implementations: This has bit me a couple times and I couldn't find specific settings that would resolve it (and though babelmark is testing against 0.2.6 I'm seeing the same behavior on 0.3.9.) |
This issue consolidates reference to issues and PRs related to code blocks. Issues will be closed, PRs will be left open, if no merge conflicts exist. See #956
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: