Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add unit tests for getOptionType #1027

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2019
Merged

Conversation

jimbo
Copy link
Contributor

@jimbo jimbo commented Mar 15, 2019

Description

Add unit tests for getOptionType.

Related Issue

N/A.

Motivation and Context

Even though getOptionType is a private function, and even though its operation is fully covered by its consumers' unit tests, it's good to have more direct coverage.

Verification

yarn test

How Has This Been Tested?

yarn test

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 15, 2019

This pull request is automatically deployed with Now.
To access deployments, click Details below or on the icon next to each push.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 15, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.005%) to 76.923% when pulling 14d61b7 on jimbo/option-type-tests into 3f23f06 on develop.

@supernova-at supernova-at self-assigned this Mar 20, 2019
@supernova-at supernova-at merged commit 41bff88 into develop Mar 20, 2019
fnhipster added a commit to PMET-public/pwa-studio that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2019
@sirugh sirugh added the version: Patch This changeset includes backwards compatible bug fixes. label May 24, 2019
@supernova-at supernova-at deleted the jimbo/option-type-tests branch July 25, 2019 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
version: Patch This changeset includes backwards compatible bug fixes.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants