We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
S_CORR_CONST
Greeting. I am thinking whether the S_CORR_CONST variable in simulation1.py should be S_CORR_CONST = 1 / (POLY6_CONST * (KERNEL_SIZE_SQR * KERNEL_SIZE_SQR - S_CORR_DELTA_Q * S_CORR_DELTA_Q) ** 3) rather than S_CORR_CONST = 1 / (POLY6_CONST * (KERNEL_SIZE_SQR - KERNEL_SIZE_SQR * S_CORR_DELTA_Q * S_CORR_DELTA_Q) ** 3)
S_CORR_CONST = 1 / (POLY6_CONST * (KERNEL_SIZE_SQR * KERNEL_SIZE_SQR - S_CORR_DELTA_Q * S_CORR_DELTA_Q) ** 3)
S_CORR_CONST = 1 / (POLY6_CONST * (KERNEL_SIZE_SQR - KERNEL_SIZE_SQR * S_CORR_DELTA_Q * S_CORR_DELTA_Q) ** 3)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Greeting.
I am thinking whether the
S_CORR_CONST
variable in simulation1.py should beS_CORR_CONST = 1 / (POLY6_CONST * (KERNEL_SIZE_SQR * KERNEL_SIZE_SQR - S_CORR_DELTA_Q * S_CORR_DELTA_Q) ** 3)
rather thanS_CORR_CONST = 1 / (POLY6_CONST * (KERNEL_SIZE_SQR - KERNEL_SIZE_SQR * S_CORR_DELTA_Q * S_CORR_DELTA_Q) ** 3)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: