Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Consistent example in Best Practices for different approaches #835

Closed
2 tasks
virkt25 opened this issue Jan 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed
2 tasks

Comments

@virkt25
Copy link
Contributor

virkt25 commented Jan 4, 2018

Best Practices section in Docs is extensively written using a top-down approach. LB4 supports both top-down and bottom-up approach. #735 will add a section on bottom-up approach but using the loopback4-example-getting-started repo which was built using the bottom-up approach.

This creates confusion since users will be faced with two different examples documenting the two different approaches which may makes it harder to understand. Users should be able to compare both approaches by being shown the approaches for the same example.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Update the bottom-up page to use the same example as the top-down approach.
  • Update any other areas for Best Practices to ensure the same example is used consistently.
@bajtos bajtos mentioned this issue Feb 6, 2018
4 tasks
@bajtos bajtos added the LB4 GA label Jul 31, 2018
@dhmlau dhmlau removed the non-DP3 label Aug 23, 2018
@dhmlau dhmlau added post-GA and removed LB4 GA labels Sep 6, 2018
@dhmlau dhmlau removed the post-GA label Nov 2, 2018
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 28, 2019

This issue has been marked stale because it has not seen activity within six months. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the CODEOWNERS file at the top-level of this repository. This issue will be closed within 30 days of being stale.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Oct 28, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 27, 2019

This issue has been closed due to continued inactivity. Thank you for your understanding. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the CODEOWNERS file at the top-level of this repository.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Nov 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants