Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[OpenAPI] Support top-down consumption of full v3 spec #751

Closed
shimks opened this issue Nov 17, 2017 · 8 comments
Closed

[OpenAPI] Support top-down consumption of full v3 spec #751

shimks opened this issue Nov 17, 2017 · 8 comments
Labels

Comments

@shimks
Copy link
Contributor

shimks commented Nov 17, 2017

Story

As a LoopBack4 user, I would like to be able to use my OpenAPI spec to scaffold a LoopBack4 application

Acceptance Criteria

TBD

@shenghu
Copy link

shenghu commented Nov 18, 2017

@shimks will loopback 4 support openapi 3 initially in later release?

@shimks
Copy link
Contributor Author

shimks commented Nov 27, 2017

@shenghu It is going to be supported in the later releases. We are currently hashing out the plans for the degree for its support

@jannyHou
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @shenghu thank you for being interested in this feature, we have a spike story for it #739, and will keep updating our plan in the comment.

@kjdelisle kjdelisle added non-MVP and removed MVP labels Dec 7, 2017
@bajtos
Copy link
Member

bajtos commented Dec 8, 2017

I think this is a duplicate of #725, what do you think @jannyHou and @kjdelisle ?

@jannyHou
Copy link
Contributor

hmm...yeah looks like #725 was created earlier and contains more details :-p

@dhmlau
Copy link
Member

dhmlau commented Jan 17, 2018

in that case, can we close it as dup of #725?

@shenghu
Copy link

shenghu commented Mar 1, 2018

#725 doesn't indicate to support openapi 3. Although we still call swagger 2.0, etc. But the whole swagger spec is renamed as OpenAPI. I'm fine #725 can cover this requirement. Just hope this can be support as early as possible.

@bajtos
Copy link
Member

bajtos commented Oct 19, 2018

Closing in favor of #1882.

@bajtos bajtos closed this as completed Oct 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants