You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been trying to understand the flow of data through the LoopBack relationships for a couple of days
Well, with that said I have started testing and open this thread to discuss it a bit.
Seeing this sketch of LB3, I conclude that the intermediate model (AssemblyPart) should not be defined and therefore it had to be built within the relationship code.
Implementation
I have been trying to understand the flow of data through the LoopBack relationships for a couple of days
Well, with that said I have started testing and open this thread to discuss it a bit.
Seeing this sketch of LB3, I conclude that the intermediate model (AssemblyPart) should not be defined and therefore it had to be built within the relationship code.
Looking at the link below,
model
will become typestring
that would contain the model namehttps://github.com/frbuceta/loopback-next/blob/feat/has-and-belongs-to-many/packages/repository/src/relations/relation.types.ts#L119-L152
What would be your opinion? @strongloop/loopback-maintainers
Acceptance criteria
TBD - will be filled by the team.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: