-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spike: Investigate setting up Windows CI workflow for connectors #3161
Comments
I am proposing to start investigating Azure Pipelines first. If it's easy to setup CI for our connectors there, then I would not bother with AppVeyor. |
I've updated the title and acceptance criteria. Thanks. |
GitHub has opened up Actions (https://github.com/features/actions) to limited beta, scheduled to become generally available on November 13. What is particularly relevant to this spike is that it is based on a fork of Azure Pipelines and the services are run on Azure VMs. Also useful is that it supports Linux, Windows, and macOS. |
An article describing how to migrate a Node.js Travis CI build to GitHub actions: https://blog.testdouble.com/posts/2019-11-21-first-look-at-github-actions/ |
This issue has been marked stale because it has not seen activity within six months. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the |
This issue has been closed due to continued inactivity. Thank you for your understanding. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the |
Description / Steps to reproduce / Feature proposal
@rmg suggested to shut down ci.strongloop.com which is mostly used for Windows testing.
This spike is to investigate how we can use AppVeyor or Azure Pipelines for Windows testing on the connectors. There are some more information on Azure Pipelines from @virkt25. See: #1752
Acceptance Criteria
cc @bajtos @b-admike
Timebox to 5 days
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: