-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spike: Strong relations in Cassandra #2344
Comments
There's a lower usage of the Cassandra connector compared to other connectors. So this task has lower priority. |
This issue has been marked stale because it has not seen activity within six months. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the |
This issue has been closed due to continued inactivity. Thank you for your understanding. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the |
This issue has been marked stale because it has not seen activity within six months. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the |
This issue has been closed due to continued inactivity. Thank you for your understanding. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the |
Research what tools are offered by Cassandra for ensuring referential integrity.
Come up with a proposal on how LoopBack applications should implement the following relations:
For example, we can recommend referencesMany or embedsMany, but also find out that a completely new relation type is needed.
See #2127 for wider context and #1718 (comment) for explanation of strong vs. weak relations.
Acceptance criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: