Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(integration): Add initial "integration tests" #3121

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

theosanderson
Copy link
Member

We decided we should have tests that will ultimately test the preprocessing pipelines and ingest. I propose to call these "integration tests" just to have a new name. Unlike other website-related tests they will live in their own top level directory.

My idea for this is that we should try to see how far we can get with these tests only interacting with Loculus in ways that users would. This means primarily the website, though as we add say a CLI it would also include that. So, setting up test data etc. can all be done through the website at least until we find that that is being flaky or too slow.

@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ def handle_helm():

if args.for_e2e or args.dev:
parameters += ["-f", HELM_CHART_DIR / "values_e2e_and_dev.yaml"]
parameters += ["--set", "auth.verifyEmail=false"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why don't we put that in the e2e values.yaml? Or even in the real values.yaml?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's called run, but it doesn't run the tests? :)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes thanks - this is mostly just WIP and will probably go :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants