Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support autorestic #63

Open
joao-p-marques opened this issue Apr 26, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Support autorestic #63

joao-p-marques opened this issue Apr 26, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
triage In dicussion if or how to implement

Comments

@joao-p-marques
Copy link

Hi!

Are there plans to support autorestic for easier configuration and management?

@niondir
Copy link
Member

niondir commented Apr 28, 2021

Currently not. Sounds more like a replacement for the docker container since some features are already implemented here like the CRON. Even multiple backup locations could be better implemented by a simple script. So I currently see no need.

If someone has good arguments I'm open for discussion.

@joao-p-marques
Copy link
Author

Ok, thanks for the reply.

Indeed, some of the functionality is doubled. My question came from the fact that there isn't currently a sandboxed and containerized way of installing autorestic AFAIK, and maybe this could do it.

The use case would be pulling the image with autorestic, passing it the configuration file and all the local volumes it should have access to to back up, and just keep it running in the background.

@niondir niondir added the triage In dicussion if or how to implement label Aug 5, 2023
@tomerh2001
Copy link

tomerh2001 commented Jan 13, 2024

+1

Autorestic just seems simpler to configure

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
triage In dicussion if or how to implement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants