-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Using code search together with fork mode does not seem to work #435
Comments
@jamestelfer Do you know what might be going on here? It seems that it should return the same types of repo here and thus not be any difference. Will be able to look into this in a few days. |
I'm not sure, I'll see if I can reproduce it |
Another difference, I realize, is that the forks already existed during the second (non- |
@gustavkj Could you rerun with codesearch again? I think it's more likely that the waiting for the fork to become available is to early. This worked before, but it could be that GitHub is no longer ready to fetch the data the same second as the repo becomes available. multi-gitter/internal/scm/github/github.go Lines 773 to 783 in c7a6e69
|
I re-ran it later yesterday, but only for one repo (still using code search) with a config something like this: Also, on the initial run (where most 30 out of 33 repos failed with the error described in this issue) one PR was created as expected and I had not forked that repo previously. |
Describe the bug
When using
multi-gitter
withcode-search
set to find repos andfork: true
, I found that the run failed with the following error for most repos:But running the same config apart from replacing
code-search
with a list of repos (same as were found by the code search), worked as expected.Config file
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
multi-gitter run ./replace.sh --config ./multi-gitter-config.yml --token $GITHUB_TOKEN
Expected behavior
Expected code to be pushed to forks and pull requests to be created towards the upstream repos.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
It is for example often useful to include detailed logs from a run with
--log-level=trace
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: