diff --git a/lightning/src/routing/router.rs b/lightning/src/routing/router.rs index e2ccd1f73ed..9423078749d 100644 --- a/lightning/src/routing/router.rs +++ b/lightning/src/routing/router.rs @@ -968,33 +968,24 @@ impl_writeable_tlv_based!(RouteHintHop, { }); #[derive(Eq, PartialEq)] +#[repr(align(64))] // Force the size to 64 bytes struct RouteGraphNode { node_id: NodeId, - lowest_fee_to_node: u64, - total_cltv_delta: u32, + score: u64, // The maximum value a yet-to-be-constructed payment path might flow through this node. // This value is upper-bounded by us by: // - how much is needed for a path being constructed // - how much value can channels following this node (up to the destination) can contribute, // considering their capacity and fees value_contribution_msat: u64, - /// The effective htlc_minimum_msat at this hop. If a later hop on the path had a higher HTLC - /// minimum, we use it, plus the fees required at each earlier hop to meet it. - path_htlc_minimum_msat: u64, - /// All penalties incurred from this hop on the way to the destination, as calculated using - /// channel scoring. - path_penalty_msat: u64, + total_cltv_delta: u32, /// The number of hops walked up to this node. path_length_to_node: u8, } impl cmp::Ord for RouteGraphNode { fn cmp(&self, other: &RouteGraphNode) -> cmp::Ordering { - let other_score = cmp::max(other.lowest_fee_to_node, other.path_htlc_minimum_msat) - .saturating_add(other.path_penalty_msat); - let self_score = cmp::max(self.lowest_fee_to_node, self.path_htlc_minimum_msat) - .saturating_add(self.path_penalty_msat); - other_score.cmp(&self_score).then_with(|| other.node_id.cmp(&self.node_id)) + other.score.cmp(&self.score).then_with(|| other.node_id.cmp(&self.node_id)) } } @@ -1004,6 +995,16 @@ impl cmp::PartialOrd for RouteGraphNode { } } +// While RouteGraphNode can be laid out with fewer bytes, performance appears to be improved +// substantially when it is laid out at exactly 64 bytes. +// +// Thus, we use `#[repr(C)]` on the struct to force a suboptimal layout and check that it stays 64 +// bytes here. +#[cfg(any(ldk_bench, not(any(test, fuzzing))))] +const _GRAPH_NODE_SMALL: usize = 64 - core::mem::size_of::(); +#[cfg(any(ldk_bench, not(any(test, fuzzing))))] +const _GRAPH_NODE_FIXED_SIZE: usize = core::mem::size_of::() - 64; + /// A wrapper around the various hop representations. /// /// Can be used to examine the properties of a hop, @@ -2120,15 +2121,6 @@ where L::Target: Logger { score_params); let path_penalty_msat = $next_hops_path_penalty_msat .saturating_add(channel_penalty_msat); - let new_graph_node = RouteGraphNode { - node_id: src_node_id, - lowest_fee_to_node: total_fee_msat, - total_cltv_delta: hop_total_cltv_delta, - value_contribution_msat, - path_htlc_minimum_msat, - path_penalty_msat, - path_length_to_node, - }; // Update the way of reaching $candidate.source() // with the given short_channel_id (from $candidate.target()), @@ -2153,6 +2145,13 @@ where L::Target: Logger { .saturating_add(path_penalty_msat); if !old_entry.was_processed && new_cost < old_cost { + let new_graph_node = RouteGraphNode { + node_id: src_node_id, + score: cmp::max(total_fee_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat).saturating_add(path_penalty_msat), + total_cltv_delta: hop_total_cltv_delta, + value_contribution_msat, + path_length_to_node, + }; targets.push(new_graph_node); old_entry.next_hops_fee_msat = $next_hops_fee_msat; old_entry.hop_use_fee_msat = hop_use_fee_msat; @@ -2226,18 +2225,26 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // meaning how much will be paid in fees after this node (to the best of our knowledge). // This data can later be helpful to optimize routing (pay lower fees). macro_rules! add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node { - ( $node: expr, $node_id: expr, $fee_to_target_msat: expr, $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, - $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat: expr, + ( $node: expr, $node_id: expr, $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_cltv_delta: expr, $next_hops_path_length: expr ) => { + let fee_to_target_msat; + let next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat; + let next_hops_path_penalty_msat; let skip_node = if let Some(elem) = dist.get_mut(&$node_id) { let was_processed = elem.was_processed; elem.was_processed = true; + fee_to_target_msat = elem.total_fee_msat; + next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat = elem.path_htlc_minimum_msat; + next_hops_path_penalty_msat = elem.path_penalty_msat; was_processed } else { // Entries are added to dist in add_entry!() when there is a channel from a node. // Because there are no channels from payee, it will not have a dist entry at this point. // If we're processing any other node, it is always be the result of a channel from it. debug_assert_eq!($node_id, maybe_dummy_payee_node_id); + fee_to_target_msat = 0; + next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat = 0; + next_hops_path_penalty_msat = 0; false }; @@ -2247,9 +2254,9 @@ where L::Target: Logger { let candidate = CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details, payer_node_id: &our_node_id, }; - add_entry!(&candidate, $fee_to_target_msat, + add_entry!(&candidate, fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, - $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat, + next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, next_hops_path_penalty_msat, $next_hops_cltv_delta, $next_hops_path_length); } } @@ -2272,10 +2279,10 @@ where L::Target: Logger { short_channel_id: *chan_id, }; add_entry!(&candidate, - $fee_to_target_msat, + fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, - $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, - $next_hops_path_penalty_msat, + next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, + next_hops_path_penalty_msat, $next_hops_cltv_delta, $next_hops_path_length); } } @@ -2320,7 +2327,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // If not, targets.pop() will not even let us enter the loop in step 2. None => {}, Some(node) => { - add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0, 0); + add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee, path_value_msat, 0, 0); }, }); @@ -2527,7 +2534,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // Both these cases (and other cases except reaching recommended_value_msat) mean that // paths_collection will be stopped because found_new_path==false. // This is not necessarily a routing failure. - 'path_construction: while let Some(RouteGraphNode { node_id, lowest_fee_to_node, total_cltv_delta, mut value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat, path_length_to_node, .. }) = targets.pop() { + 'path_construction: while let Some(RouteGraphNode { node_id, total_cltv_delta, mut value_contribution_msat, path_length_to_node, .. }) = targets.pop() { // Since we're going payee-to-payer, hitting our node as a target means we should stop // traversing the graph and arrange the path out of what we found. @@ -2662,8 +2669,8 @@ where L::Target: Logger { match network_nodes.get(&node_id) { None => {}, Some(node) => { - add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node, - value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat, + add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, + value_contribution_msat, total_cltv_delta, path_length_to_node); }, }