Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New AA Work #5

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

lightclient
Copy link
Owner

Just making this so it's easier to review.

Added an indestructable property to a contract instance
-added new EVM error for when an indestructible contract tries to self destruct
-added if case in opsuicide to throw the error described above when an indestructible contract tries to opSuicide
-appeased some golint stuff
* added 2937 to valideip map
* added comments to exported functions to appease go linter
* updated bastanchury instructionset to inherit yolov2
* set opcode to 0xa8 per eip spec
Copy link
Owner Author

@lightclient lightclient left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good so far!

// enable1344 applies EIP-1344 (ChainID Opcode)
// - Adds an opcode that returns the current chains EIP-155 unique identifier
// - Adds an opcode that returns the current chain's EIP-155 unique identifier
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally, the geth team prefers PRs which modify only code which pertain to the work at hand. I recommend reverting this change and apply in a separate PR upstream.

chainId, _ := uint256.FromBig(interpreter.evm.chainConfig.ChainID)
callContext.stack.push(chainId)
chainID, _ := uint256.FromBig(interpreter.evm.chainConfig.ChainID)
callContext.stack.push(chainID)
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similarly, I recommend reverting this and instead apply the change upstream.

lightclient pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2021
* eth/protocols: persist received state segments

* core: initial implementation

* core/state/snapshot: add tests

* core, eth: updates

* eth/protocols/snapshot: count flat state size

* core/state: add metrics

* core/state/snapshot: skip unnecessary deletion

* core/state/snapshot: rename

* core/state/snapshot: use the global batch

* core/state/snapshot: add logs and fix wiping

* core/state/snapshot: fix

* core/state/snapshot: save generation progress even if the batch is empty

* core/state/snapshot: fixes

* core/state/snapshot: fix initial account range length

* core/state/snapshot: fix initial account range

* eth/protocols/snap: store flat states during the healing

* eth/protocols/snap: print logs

* core/state/snapshot: refactor (#4)

* core/state/snapshot: refactor

* core/state/snapshot: tiny fix and polish

Co-authored-by: rjl493456442 <[email protected]>

* core, eth: fixes

* core, eth: fix healing writer

* core, trie, eth: fix paths

* eth/protocols/snap: fix encoding

* eth, core: add debug log

* core/state/generate: release iterator asap (#5)

core/state/snapshot: less copy

core/state/snapshot: revert split loop

core/state/snapshot: handle storage becoming empty, improve test robustness

core/state: test modified codehash

core/state/snapshot: polish

* core/state/snapshot: optimize stats counter

* core, eth: add metric

* core/state/snapshot: update comments

* core/state/snapshot: improve tests

* core/state/snapshot: replace secure trie with standard trie

* core/state/snapshot: wrap return as the struct

* core/state/snapshot: skip wiping correct states

* core/state/snapshot: updates

* core/state/snapshot: fixes

* core/state/snapshot: fix panic due to reference flaw in closure

* core/state/snapshot: fix errors in state generation logic + fix log output

* core/state/snapshot: remove an error case

* core/state/snapshot: fix condition-check for exhausted snap state

* core/state/snapshot: use stackTrie for small tries

* core/state/snapshot: don't resolve small storage tries in vain

* core/state/snapshot: properly clean up storage of deleted accounts

* core/state/snapshot: avoid RLP-encoding in some cases + minor nitpicks

* core/state/snapshot: fix error (+testcase)

* core/state/snapshot: clean up tests a bit

* core/state/snapshot: work in progress on better tests

* core/state/snapshot: polish code

* core/state/snapshot: fix trie iteration abortion trigger

* core/state/snapshot: fixes flaws

* core/state/snapshot: remove panic

* core/state/snapshot: fix abort

* core/state/snapshot: more tests (plus failing testcase)

* core/state/snapshot: more testcases + fix for failing test

* core/state/snapshot: testcase for malformed data

* core/state/snapshot: some test nitpicks

* core/state/snapshot: improvements to logging

* core/state/snapshot: testcase to demo error in abortion

* core/state/snapshot: fix abortion

* cmd/geth: make verify-state report the root

* trie: fix failing test

* core/state/snapshot: add timer metrics

* core/state/snapshot: fix metrics

* core/state/snapshot: udpate tests

* eth/protocols/snap: write snapshot account even if code or state is needed

* core/state/snapshot: fix diskmore check

* core/state/snapshot: review fixes

* core/state/snapshot: improve error message

* cmd/geth: rename 'error' to 'err' in logs

* core/state/snapshot: fix some review concerns

* core/state/snapshot, eth/protocols/snap: clear snapshot marker when starting/resuming snap sync

* core: add error log

* core/state/snapshot: use proper timers for metrics collection

* core/state/snapshot: address some review concerns

* eth/protocols/snap: improved log message

* eth/protocols/snap: fix heal logs to condense infos

* core/state/snapshot: wait for generator termination before restarting

* core/state/snapshot: revert timers to counters to track total time

Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Péter Szilágyi <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants