-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
RFC: Event bus #10
Comments
Adding https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zTqwWQNOqrzVqmwnWUqKsHq8fHFLSByhTvMNrgBoIXI/edit here which briefly lists the open source alternatives to RabbitMQ that were evaluated (ZeroMQ and ActiveMQ), plus:
|
Pointing out this analysis was originally scoped to Libero Publisher, but is |
We've been doing quite a bit of work looking into a generic event bus system for libero-reviewer. Part of this work has been in collaboration with PubSweet where we tried to agree with Hindawi on the interface for a generic event bus, so we could support the "event bus" pattern without needing to align on the specific technology (as Hindawi use AWS SQS and SNS -- not the choice for libero). Reviewer currently includes an implementation of this pattern using RabbitMQ, details of which can be found here: https://github.com/libero/reviewer/tree/master/lib/event-bus |
Would be interesting to include here whatever decisions are made at the PubSweet level, as these are a coupling point. For example if https://github.com/libero/reviewer/blob/master/lib/event-bus/src/event-bus/index.ts#L5-L17 goes into PubSweet and Libero products align themselves between each other, then Pubsweet dictates the format of messages for all Libero products. |
Problem
Libero needs to allow for disparate services to indirectly communicate with each other, so they can monitor and react to data changes.
Suggestion
Concerns
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: