You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tried using the baseline model with LSTM on my version of the dataset. I downloaded the videos and loaded the labels using the make_dataset.py script. However, the labels in my dataset don't match the original ones. Despite this, I tested the model on this modified dataset using the average of the user_summary annotations as the evaluation labels. The resulting F-score was about 0.30. Then, I tried using the maximum value instead, which gave better results with an F-score of 0.52.
Later, I tried evaluating the model using the gt_score and converting it to shot summaries, similar to our training approach. After evaluation, I got an average F-score of 0.70. But the F1-score varied a lot.
As you can see in the image, the F1-score keeps changing. My question is whether this way of evaluating is not good, and if the unstable F-score indicates a problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I tried using the baseline model with LSTM on my version of the dataset. I downloaded the videos and loaded the labels using the
make_dataset.py
script. However, the labels in my dataset don't match the original ones. Despite this, I tested the model on this modified dataset using the average of the user_summary annotations as the evaluation labels. The resulting F-score was about 0.30. Then, I tried using the maximum value instead, which gave better results with an F-score of 0.52.Later, I tried evaluating the model using the gt_score and converting it to shot summaries, similar to our training approach. After evaluation, I got an average F-score of 0.70. But the F1-score varied a lot.
As you can see in the image, the F1-score keeps changing. My question is whether this way of evaluating is not good, and if the unstable F-score indicates a problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: