Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consider re-license or dual Apache v2.0 #87

Closed
ofek opened this issue Aug 3, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

consider re-license or dual Apache v2.0 #87

ofek opened this issue Aug 3, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@ofek
Copy link

ofek commented Aug 3, 2017

LGPLv3 may be incompatible with Apache v2.0. See:

rubychan/coderay#25
https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/81947/why-is-jquery-released-under-mit-and-not-lgpl

Maybe even do dual Apache v2.0/MIT like the Rust community sfackler/rust-postgres-macros#19

Also just fyi to give you scope, jwcrypto was downloaded via pip 3473 times in the last 30 days.

bigquery

SELECT                                            
  details.installer.name as installer_name,       
  COUNT(*) as download_count,                     
FROM                                              
  TABLE_DATE_RANGE(                               
    [the-psf:pypi.downloads],                     
    DATE_ADD(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(), -31, "day"),    
    DATE_ADD(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(), -1, "day")      
  )                                               
WHERE                                             
  file.project = "jwcrypto"                       
GROUP BY                                          
  installer_name,                                 
ORDER BY                                          
  download_count DESC                             
LIMIT 20                                          
@simo5
Copy link
Member

simo5 commented Aug 3, 2017

Thank you for your point, but at the moment we are fine with LGPL.
If, however, someone has some actual legal issue with it and makes a case for it we will consider a change.

@simo5 simo5 closed this as completed Aug 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants