You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, in the engineering model bus_type is inferred from both the fields on the component, e.g. if vm and va is present then the bus would be assumed to be a reference bus, and from the components connected to the bus, e.g. if a voltage_source is connected then the bus would be a bus_type=3 in the mathematical model, and bus_type = 2 if a PV generator is attached to said bus. However, if the generator is droop we might expect that the bus_type != 2 as correct_bus_types current does.
Currently, in the engineering model
bus_type
is inferred from both the fields on the component, e.g. if vm and va is present then the bus would be assumed to be a reference bus, and from the components connected to the bus, e.g. if a voltage_source is connected then the bus would be a bus_type=3 in the mathematical model, and bus_type = 2 if a PV generator is attached to said bus. However, if the generator is droop we might expect that the bus_type != 2 as correct_bus_types current does.Related to change made in PR #295
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: