Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not require @experimental on anonymous classes #13155

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2021

Conversation

nicolasstucki
Copy link
Contributor

These calsses will not define new methods in the API for which we would need to check the presence of the annotation.

Fixes #13091

These calsses will not define new methods in the API for which we would need to check the presence of the annotation.

Fixes scala#13091
Copy link
Member

@dwijnand dwijnand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, simple

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki merged commit 809a628 into scala:master Jul 26, 2021
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki deleted the fix-#13091 branch July 26, 2021 12:33
@Kordyjan Kordyjan added this to the 3.1.0 milestone Aug 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Experimental trait cannot be instantiated anonymously
3 participants