You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
These tests are currently broken, as a lot of the logic for the ERC20 bridge contracts was quickly hardcoded to make it compile but is not correct. The deposit function for the L1ERC20Bridge.sol contracts should take an extra parameter that acts as the "msg.value" field in the case of a ZK stack with an ERC20 as its native token
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
🌟 Feature Request
📝 Description
These tests are currently broken, as a lot of the logic for the
ERC20
bridge contracts was quickly hardcoded to make it compile but is not correct. Thedeposit
function for theL1ERC20Bridge.sol
contracts should take an extra parameter that acts as the "msg.value
" field in the case of a ZK stack with an ERC20 as its native tokenThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: