You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
But when I check the paramter in metaseq document, it said
shift_width : int
Each item from the genomic signal (e.g., reads from a BAM file) will be shifted shift_width bp in the 3’ direction. This can be useful for reconstructing a ChIP-seq profile, using the shift width determined from the peak-caller (e.g., modeled d in MACS). Not available for bigWig.
In my opinion, the shift_width is based on the single_end and short read length. But now, almost all sequencing is PE 150. So is it necessary to set the paramter?
By the way, I found whether set the paramter will make a great influence on the result. If I set the paramter, the TSS enrichment will be 6 while drop the paramter, my enrichment will be 4.
And the 4 is same as my own R script calculated TSS enrichment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi
I noticed in line 430. when get the count of bam, you shift_width to center the read on the cut site
But when I check the paramter in metaseq document, it said
In my opinion, the shift_width is based on the single_end and short read length. But now, almost all sequencing is PE 150. So is it necessary to set the paramter?
By the way, I found whether set the paramter will make a great influence on the result. If I set the paramter, the TSS enrichment will be 6 while drop the paramter, my enrichment will be 4.
And the 4 is same as my own R script calculated TSS enrichment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: