Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(helm): use object instead of list for plugins.policies #5735

Conversation

michaelbeaumont
Copy link
Contributor

@michaelbeaumont michaelbeaumont commented Jan 17, 2023

This allows it to be 'appended' to by other charts. This is technically a breaking change but we can include this in UPGRADE.md.

Checklist prior to review

  • Link to docs PR or issue --
  • Link to UI issue or PR --
  • Is the issue worked on linked? --
  • The PR does not hardcode values that might break projects that depend on kuma (e.g. "kumahq" as a image registry) --
  • The PR will work for both Linux and Windows, system specific functions like syscall.Mkfifo have equivalent implementation on the other OS --
  • Unit Tests --
  • E2E Tests --
  • Manual Universal Tests --
  • Manual Kubernetes Tests --
  • Do you need to update UPGRADE.md? --
  • Does it need to be backported according to the backporting policy? --
  • Do you need to explicitly set a > Changelog: entry here or add a ci/ label to run fewer/more tests?

@michaelbeaumont michaelbeaumont requested review from a team, slonka, lobkovilya and Automaat and removed request for a team January 17, 2023 13:26
This allows it to be 'appended' to by other charts.

Signed-off-by: Mike Beaumont <[email protected]>
@michaelbeaumont michaelbeaumont force-pushed the feat/helm_use_objects_plugins_policies branch from 092a04a to 6376187 Compare January 17, 2023 13:37
@slonka
Copy link
Contributor

slonka commented Jan 17, 2023

This is technically a breaking change but we can include this in UPGRADE.md.

Please add it there. If we know of any charts (other then ours) that depend on our charts let's also reach out to the maintainers.

@slonka
Copy link
Contributor

slonka commented Jan 17, 2023

I think the CI check failed because of #5680, merged master. Side note: do we need e2e tests for this (might be worth adding a label) since helm chart check is in GH Action?

@lahabana
Copy link
Contributor

This is technically a breaking change but we can include this in UPGRADE.md.

Was this ever released already? I don't think so so it's fine to do a breaking change

@michaelbeaumont
Copy link
Contributor Author

Was this ever released already? I don't think so so it's fine to do a breaking change

Unfortunately it's in release-2.0 already.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants