Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(e2e): disable amd64 self-hosted runners #11862

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

jakubdyszkiewicz
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

IPV6 tests seems to be broken with our self-hosted runners.
It's not clear what's the problem, it can take some time to resolve it.
We'd rather have a slower CI with queues than CI which is broken. We can still keep arm64 tests on self-hosted runners because those do not run IPV6.

Implementation information

Supporting documentation

Broken CI

@jakubdyszkiewicz jakubdyszkiewicz added the ci/run-full-matrix PR: Runs all possible e2e test combination (expensive use carefully) label Oct 25, 2024
@jakubdyszkiewicz jakubdyszkiewicz requested a review from a team as a code owner October 25, 2024 09:17
@jakubdyszkiewicz jakubdyszkiewicz requested review from jijiechen and lukidzi and removed request for a team October 25, 2024 09:17
@jijiechen
Copy link
Member

An example failure: https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/actions/runs/11511857590/job/32049736504
I'll work on it on Monday.

@jakubdyszkiewicz jakubdyszkiewicz enabled auto-merge (squash) October 25, 2024 09:20
@jakubdyszkiewicz jakubdyszkiewicz merged commit 31abdd6 into master Oct 25, 2024
36 checks passed
@jakubdyszkiewicz jakubdyszkiewicz deleted the feat/disable-self-hosted-runners-ipv6 branch October 25, 2024 11:12
michaelbeaumont added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
…ts (#11894)

## Motivation

We suspect DNS lookups themselves are timing out and [causing
flakes](https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/actions/runs/11514774996/job/32152139325).
This may be related to #11862

Similar to #11874

Signed-off-by: Mike Beaumont <[email protected]>
kumahq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
…ts (#11894)

## Motivation

We suspect DNS lookups themselves are timing out and [causing
flakes](https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/actions/runs/11514774996/job/32152139325).
This may be related to #11862

Similar to #11874

Signed-off-by: Mike Beaumont <[email protected]>
kumahq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
…ts (#11894)

## Motivation

We suspect DNS lookups themselves are timing out and [causing
flakes](https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/actions/runs/11514774996/job/32152139325).
This may be related to #11862

Similar to #11874

Signed-off-by: Mike Beaumont <[email protected]>
kumahq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
…ts (#11894)

## Motivation

We suspect DNS lookups themselves are timing out and [causing
flakes](https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/actions/runs/11514774996/job/32152139325).
This may be related to #11862

Similar to #11874

Signed-off-by: Mike Beaumont <[email protected]>
kumahq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
…ts (#11894)

## Motivation

We suspect DNS lookups themselves are timing out and [causing
flakes](https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/actions/runs/11514774996/job/32152139325).
This may be related to #11862

Similar to #11874

Signed-off-by: Mike Beaumont <[email protected]>
kumahq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
…ts (#11894)

## Motivation

We suspect DNS lookups themselves are timing out and [causing
flakes](https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/actions/runs/11514774996/job/32152139325).
This may be related to #11862

Similar to #11874

Signed-off-by: Mike Beaumont <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 29, 2024

backporting to release-2.6 with action

backporting to release-2.9 with action
backporting to release-2.7 with action
backporting to release-2.5 with action

Copy link
Contributor

backporting to release-2.8 with action

kumahq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
IPV6 tests seems to be broken with our self-hosted runners.
It's not clear what's the problem, it can take some time to resolve it.
We'd rather have a slower CI with queues than CI which is broken. We can
still keep arm64 tests on self-hosted runners because those do not run
IPV6.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Dyszkiewicz <[email protected]>
kumahq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
IPV6 tests seems to be broken with our self-hosted runners.
It's not clear what's the problem, it can take some time to resolve it.
We'd rather have a slower CI with queues than CI which is broken. We can
still keep arm64 tests on self-hosted runners because those do not run
IPV6.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Dyszkiewicz <[email protected]>
kumahq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
## Motivation

IPV6 tests seems to be broken with our self-hosted runners.
It's not clear what's the problem, it can take some time to resolve it.
We'd rather have a slower CI with queues than CI which is broken. We can
still keep arm64 tests on self-hosted runners because those do not run
IPV6.

## Implementation information

## Supporting documentation

Signed-off-by: Jakub Dyszkiewicz <[email protected]>
kumahq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
IPV6 tests seems to be broken with our self-hosted runners.
It's not clear what's the problem, it can take some time to resolve it.
We'd rather have a slower CI with queues than CI which is broken. We can
still keep arm64 tests on self-hosted runners because those do not run
IPV6.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Dyszkiewicz <[email protected]>
kumahq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
IPV6 tests seems to be broken with our self-hosted runners.
It's not clear what's the problem, it can take some time to resolve it.
We'd rather have a slower CI with queues than CI which is broken. We can
still keep arm64 tests on self-hosted runners because those do not run
IPV6.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Dyszkiewicz <[email protected]>
michaelbeaumont pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
…1905)

Automatic cherry-pick of #11862 for branch release-2.9

Generated by
[action](https://github.com/kumahq/kuma/actions/runs/11570533761)

cherry-picked commit 31abdd6

Signed-off-by: Jakub Dyszkiewicz <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jakub Dyszkiewicz <[email protected]>
jakubdyszkiewicz added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
## Motivation

Renable self-hosted runners that were disabled here
#11862

## Implementation information

Docker changes were tested here
#11872

---------

Signed-off-by: Jakub Dyszkiewicz <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport ci/run-full-matrix PR: Runs all possible e2e test combination (expensive use carefully)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants