Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Ability to configure limits and requests of CPU/Memory on PolicyServer CRD #710

Closed
brunorene opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@brunorene
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem?

Yes at the moment we need to create a LimitRange resource to limit memory for the policy server deployment.

Solution you'd like

The PolicyServer CRD would have a block to configure limits and requests for CPU and memory for the policy server deployment and also be able to configure it through kubewarden-defaults Helm Chart.

Alternatives you've considered

At the moment we are using LimitRange but it applies to all the namespace so it is not a very good solution.

Anything else?

Not really thanks

@viccuad
Copy link
Member

viccuad commented Mar 11, 2024

Relates to #564.

@flavio
Copy link
Member

flavio commented Mar 25, 2024

Admission Criteria

@flavio flavio added this to the 1.12 milestone Mar 25, 2024
@fabriziosestito fabriziosestito self-assigned this Apr 3, 2024
@fabriziosestito fabriziosestito transferred this issue from kubewarden/policy-server Apr 8, 2024
@fabriziosestito fabriziosestito moved this to In Progress in Kubewarden Apr 8, 2024
@viccuad
Copy link
Member

viccuad commented Apr 16, 2024

Skipping exposing this new features through Rancher UI, see kubewarden/helm-charts#418.

With that, this is done, will get shipped on the next release.

@viccuad viccuad closed this as completed Apr 16, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in Kubewarden Apr 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants