fix failpath

[YiscahLevySilas1]

PR Type:

Bug fix

---

PR Description:

This pull request addresses an issue with incorrect path references in the ingress rules. The changes involve modifying the path references in both the 'raw.rego' and 'expected.json' files to correctly point to the 'spec.rules' instead of 'ingress.spec.rules'.

---

PR Main Files Walkthrough:

rules/exposure-to-internet/raw.rego: The path reference in the 'svc_connected_to_ingress' function has been corrected from 'ingress.spec.rules' to 'spec.rules'.
rules/exposure-to-internet/test/failed_with_ingress/expected.json: The path reference in the 'failedPaths' array has been corrected from 'ingress.spec.rules' to 'spec.rules'.

---

User Description:

Overview

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Fixing incorrect path references in ingress rules
• 📝 PR summary: This PR addresses an issue with incorrect path references in the ingress rules. The changes involve modifying the path references in both the 'raw.rego' and 'expected.json' files to correctly point to the 'spec.rules' instead of 'ingress.spec.rules'.
• 📌 Type of PR: Bug fix
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and the changes made are clear. However, it would be beneficial to add tests that verify the correctness of the new path references. This would ensure that the changes work as expected and prevent potential regressions in the future.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: rules/exposure-to-internet/raw.rego
    suggestion: Consider adding error handling for the case where 'spec.rules' or 'http.paths' might be undefined or null. This could prevent potential runtime errors. [important]
    relevant line: result := [sprintf("spec.rules[%d].http.paths[%d].backend.service.name", [i,j])]

  • relevant file: rules/exposure-to-internet/test/failed_with_ingress/expected.json
    suggestion: Consider adding more diverse test cases in the 'failedPaths' array to ensure the path reference change works for all possible scenarios. [medium]
    relevant line: "spec.rules[0].http.paths[0].backend.service.name"

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: success
• Vulnerabilities scan: failure
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success