-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 392
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
coordinated contact point for patch release team #516
Comments
@kubernetes/sig-release what precedent/preferences do we have for formalizing a closed sub-project team? There's been the release-team and milestone-burndown and some shuffling around on those. This would need to be a closed mailing list (ie: public can send to it, only members receive) due to the security nature. |
Presumably the PST has precedent for this? |
/assign |
I feel like this group is sort of a sub-team of SIG Release and PST. I believe we'll want member nominees to get approval from both of those bodies. |
pull #534 includes an example of how I hope this list is useful for discoverability and ease of contact...a mailto: link :) |
We now have @kubernetes/patch-release-team in addition to the email [email protected] so marking this as done. |
Related to #331 we need a single point of contact for the patch release branch managers or "patch release team".
I propose creating a "kubernetes-patch-release-team" Google Group for this purpose. This group's initial membership would be @aleksandra-malinowska @feiskyer @foxish and @tpepper.
Similarly a GitHub team would enable @ mentioning the team.
Part of #331 needs to be defining the forward criteria for membership in the group/team and how we add and remove members across time.
In the meantime it would be easier/consistent/discoverable to have a list as the one subscribed to the kubernetes-security list (instead of multiple folks directly) and use the group/team as the reference to "contact us" in our announcements in kubernetes-dev-announce and kubernetes-dev instead of telling people to @ specific people.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: