Fix building for ppc64le and arm(v7) in kicbase

[spowelljr]

Building for ppc64le in kicbase was failing so we removed it (#12398) so we could release, ppc64le should be revisited and added back.

[sharifelgamal]

the error itself:

15:06:41 #160 57.33 Reading state information...
15:06:41 #160 57.96 E: Unable to locate package catatonit
15:06:41 #160 57.96 E: Unable to locate package cri-tools
15:06:41 #160 57.96 E: Unable to locate package podman-plugins

[sharifelgamal]

for armv7:

17:48:54  > [linux/arm/v7 stage-1  9/38] RUN sh -c "echo 'deb https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu focal stable' > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/docker.list" &&     curl -L https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu/gpg -o docker.key &&     apt-key add - < docker.key &&     clean-install docker-ce docker-ce-cli containerd.io:
17:48:54 #115 36.93 Reading state information...
17:48:54 #115 37.31 Package docker-ce is not available, but is referred to by another package.
17:48:54 #115 37.31 This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
17:48:54 #115 37.31 is only available from another source
17:48:54 #115 37.31 
17:48:54 #115 37.89 E: Package 'docker-ce' has no installation candidate
17:48:54 #115 37.89 E: Unable to locate package docker-ce-cli
17:48:54 #115 37.89 E: Unable to locate package containerd.io
17:48:54 #115 37.89 E: Couldn't find any package by glob 'containerd.io'
17:48:54 #115 37.89 E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'containerd.io'

[afbjorklund]

You can view the upstream packages here: https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/devel:kubic:libcontainers:stable

• https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:kubic:libcontainers:stable/catatonit

• https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:kubic:libcontainers:stable/cri-tools

• https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:kubic:libcontainers:stable/podman-plugins

Seems like the ppc64le arch was disabled for Ubuntu, even if available for some other distributions such as Fedora.

[afbjorklund]

For Docker, I think you have to resort to the tarballs rather than the packages ? But upstream claims to support both:

https://docs.docker.com/engine/install/ubuntu/

echo \
  "deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/docker-archive-keyring.gpg] https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu \
  $(lsb_release -cs) stable" | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/docker.list > /dev/null

[afbjorklund]

@sharifelgamal : this is a bug in the docker packaging for arm32, you need to use the 18.04 packages also on 20.04 :

docker/for-linux#1035

So $(lsb_release -cs) can't be used, it needs to be "bionic" on armhf and "focal" on all the rest of the architectures (4)

https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu/dists/bionic/pool/stable/

https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu/dists/focal/pool/stable/

[afbjorklund]

@sharifelgamal : looks like cri-o is looking for some help, when it comes to supporting ppc64 and I guess also the .deb

cri-o/cri-o#2467

is it ok/enough to consider arches supported by fedora?

[spowelljr]

According to discussion, if we can't make crio with with PowerPC, just not include if for that arch and let the user know

[medyagh]

Lets skip crio on powerpc and arm32