Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

need to add disk IO aware scheduling to avoid the PODs competing for disk IO resource #624

Closed
1 of 4 tasks
cathyhongzhang opened this issue Aug 22, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #628 · May be fixed by #762
Closed
1 of 4 tasks

need to add disk IO aware scheduling to avoid the PODs competing for disk IO resource #624

cathyhongzhang opened this issue Aug 22, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #628 · May be fixed by #762
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.

Comments

@cathyhongzhang
Copy link

Area

  • Scheduler
  • Controller
  • Helm Chart
  • Documents

Other components

No response

What happened?

The current Kubernetes scheduler only supports cpu, memory, and storage aware scheduling. It does not support disk IO resource-aware scheduling. It could happen that the pods scheduled onto a node compete for the disk IO resource, resulting in performance degradation (the noisy neighbor problem). There is an increasing demand for adding disk IO resource-aware scheduling to Kubernetes to avoid or mitigate the noisy neighbor problem.

A disk IO scheduler plugin can be developed to support disk IO resource-aware scheduling. The plugin would check the new pod's requested disk IO BW against each node's real-time available disk IO BW when making the scheduling decision.

What did you expect to happen?

A disk IO scheduler plugin KEP proposal and corresponding implementation

How can we reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?

No response

Anything else we need to know?

No response

Kubernetes version

$ kubectl version
# paste output here

Scheduler Plugins version

@cathyhongzhang cathyhongzhang added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Aug 22, 2023
@zwpaper
Copy link
Member

zwpaper commented Aug 31, 2023

/remove-kind bug
/kind feature

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. and removed kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Aug 31, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 27, 2024
@cathyhongzhang
Copy link
Author

A KEP has been proposed to address this issue. https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/scheduler-plugins/pull/628

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 28, 2024
@ichbinblau
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Feb 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Projects
None yet
5 participants