fix: Allow patches with empty files with multiple newlines or comments

[jchanam]

Fixes #5487

Right now, when a file is empty, the patches given by the resmap (sm patches) or the jsonpatch is nil. When the file has only comments in it (virtually empty if we think about changes to be made) or multiple newlines, the result given by said functions is an empty slice.

I've changed the check for when we can't allow to have a patch that is valid for both SM and JSON, so it allows empty changes (both nil or empty slices).

Extra comments:

• I think that it'd be better to change the functions and return a nil object, instead of an empty slice, but I'm unsure on where to do those changes.
• Also, I can't make the tests to run locally as they complain for the content file to be empty, and that should not be the case as it's perfectly ok for the built binary to use empty patches.

I'll be more than happy to work on these two with some help or guidance.

[k8s-ci-robot]

This PR has multiple commits, and the default merge method is: merge.
You can request commits to be squashed using the label: tide/merge-method-squash

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @jchanam!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kustomize 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kustomize has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @jchanam. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jchanam
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign knverey for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[jchanam]

Hi @stormqueen1990 @varshaprasad96,

Could I get some help in getting this approved?

Thank you!

[stormqueen1990]

Hi @stormqueen1990 @varshaprasad96,

Could I get some help in getting this approved?

Thank you!

Hi there, @jchanam!

I am taking a look at this and got a bit confused with the comment you made in the PR description about the tests. Do you mean that tests are currently failing locally?

[stormqueen1990]

/test all

[k8s-ci-robot]

@jchanam: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
kustomize-presubmit-master	5952169	link	true	/test kustomize-presubmit-master

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[jchanam]

Hi @stormqueen1990 ,

Yes, I meant that. It looks like there are a test checking if the input is not empty, but the goal of my code is testing specifically that, as it should not fail. If we add a file to kustomize that is empty, it should simply not produce any output, instead of failing.

Also, now the tests here say that there's a diff found on the file I've modified. How can I fix that or change extra code so the tests continue?

Thank you!

[jchanam]

@stormqueen1990 This is an example of what I mean.

Here I'm testing the input to be a file with only a new line. Based on my new code, this should give no error, but I'm getting a specific error from the tests extra code saying that the input to RunTransformerAndCheckError can't be empty.

[stormqueen1990]

You're missing a go generate step for this code. The plugin/builtin/patchtransformer/PatchTransformer.go file you updated is a scaffold for the plugin generated under api/internal/builtins/PatchTransformer.go; therefore, you will need to run go generate plugin/builtin/patchtransformer/PatchTransformer.go to update the final built-in plugin code.

You can also run the prow checks locally using make prow-presubmit-check from the root of the repository.

[jchanam]

Thank you so much @stormqueen1990

I've just generated the plugin and pushed the change.

Regarding the test, I run them locally, but I'm given an error that IMO shouldn't happen, as it's complaining of exactly what I want to test:

2024/11/19 15:09:31 compiler created: /Users/juliochana/github/kustomize/plugin/builtin/patchtransformer/PatchTransformer.so
    harnessenhanced.go:219: config: '
        '
    harnessenhanced.go:220: Err: expected 1 resource, found 0 in [10]
--- FAIL: TestPatchTransformerPatchEmpty (0.71s)
=== RUN   TestPatchTransformerPatchEmptyOnlyComments
2024/11/19 15:09:32 compiler created: /Users/juliochana/github/kustomize/plugin/builtin/patchtransformer/PatchTransformer.so
    harnessenhanced.go:219: config: '
        # File with only comments

        # Is a virtually empty yaml
        '
    harnessenhanced.go:220: Err: expected 1 resource, found 0 in [10 35 32 70 105 108 101 32 119 105 116 104 32 111 110 108 121 32 99 111 109 109 101 110 116 115 10 10 35 32 73 115 32 97 32 118 105 114 116 117 97 108 108 121 32 101 109 112 116 121 32 121 97 109 108 10]
--- FAIL: TestPatchTransformerPatchEmptyOnlyComments (0.68s)
FAIL
FAIL	command-line-arguments	17.627s
FAIL
**** FAILURE in ./plugin/builtin/patchtransformer

I'm adding an "empty file" (for kustomize) and with my change, it should work. Could you help me improving this testing scaffolding so it stops complaining about the empty file?