Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Auto dependency dump like dependabot #10681

Open
yankay opened this issue Dec 1, 2023 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #11557
Open

Auto dependency dump like dependabot #10681

yankay opened this issue Dec 1, 2023 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #11557
Labels
help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.

Comments

@yankay
Copy link
Member

yankay commented Dec 1, 2023

What would you like to be added:

There are lot of components needs by kubespray , like :

  • kube
  • containered

in the list : https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubespray/issues/new?assignees=&labels=kind%2Ffeature&projects=&template=enhancement.md

The idea it to using the CI generate Issue/PR for update the components new version, like the https://github.com/dependabot

Why is this needed:

If there are "Auto dependency dump", it can make kubespray use newer software , and the maintainers can save time.

@yankay yankay added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Dec 1, 2023
@yankay yankay changed the title Auto dependency dump Auto dependency dump like dependabot Dec 1, 2023
@yankay yankay added the help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. label Dec 1, 2023
@VannTen
Copy link
Contributor

VannTen commented Dec 1, 2023

Regarding the kube module, I think we should instead use kubernetes.core.k8s and just ditch it. I've taken a quick look the other day, and by using the template feature of kubernetes.core.k8s (which can take several templates at once), I think we could save some execution time (with less code).

@VannTen
Copy link
Contributor

VannTen commented Dec 1, 2023

For the rest, yeah, if we could automate any "bump that version" stuff, yeah, that would be a win.
(Including the "checksums" stuff). We already have some scripts for that (scripts/download_hash.py), so it would be a matter of hooking it up in some CI.

@MrFreezeex
Copy link
Member

For the rest, yeah, if we could automate any "bump that version" stuff, yeah, that would be a win. (Including the "checksums" stuff). We already have some scripts for that (scripts/download_hash.py), so it would be a matter of hooking it up in some CI.

I did not use those a lot, but note that AFAIK the .sh version is more complete on what it can do

This was referenced Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants