Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update rmp to test for running sandbox #465

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2019

Conversation

saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

@saschagrunert saschagrunert commented May 29, 2019

Running pod sandboxes have to be stopped before the actual removal. To
achieve a better user-experience, we now error in that case and give the
user the option to ignore it with the added -f flag for rmp.

Closes #464

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label May 29, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from runcom and yujuhong May 29, 2019 06:59
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 29, 2019
if err != nil {
return err
}
if !ctx.Bool("force") &&
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if force is true and sandbox state is READY, then invoke StopPodSandbox() before RemovePodSandbox?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes that sounds good, I will change it as adapted.

Running pod sandboxes have to be stopped before the actual removal. To
achieve a better user-experience, we now error in that case and give the
user the option to ignore it with the added `-f` flag for `rmp`.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@feiskyer feiskyer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 29, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: feiskyer, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 29, 2019
@feiskyer feiskyer merged commit 9d7bac3 into kubernetes-sigs:master May 30, 2019
@feiskyer
Copy link
Member

The CI has been passed from travis page, but didn't reflect the status from github hook. Merged this manually.

@saschagrunert saschagrunert deleted the rmp-force branch May 30, 2019 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Stop sandbox implicitly on rmp
3 participants