Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 6, 2022. It is now read-only.

fix: make allErrs complete in validateServiceClassSpec #2749

Merged

Conversation

beautytiger
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is a

  • Feature Implementation
  • Bug Fix
  • Documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

Fixes #

Please leave this checklist in the PR comment so that maintainers can ensure a good PR.

Merge Checklist:

  • New feature
    • Tests
    • Documentation
  • SVCat CLI flag
  • Server Flag for config
    • Chart changes
    • removing a flag by marking deprecated and hiding to avoid
      breaking the chart release and existing clients who provide a
      flag that will get an error when they try to update

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 7, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @beautytiger. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 7, 2019
@mszostok
Copy link
Contributor

mszostok commented Nov 7, 2019

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 7, 2019
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ func validateServiceClassSpec(spec *sc.ServiceClassSpec, fldPath *field.Path, cr
commonErrs := validateCommonServiceClassSpec(&spec.CommonServiceClassSpec, fldPath, create)

if len(commonErrs) != 0 {
allErrs = append(commonErrs)
allErrs = append(allErrs, commonErrs...)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice catch, it's been here for almost 2 years :D

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Nov 7, 2019

@beautytiger: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
pull-service-catalog-test-e2e 37817b4 link /test pull-service-catalog-test-e2e

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@mszostok
Copy link
Contributor

mszostok commented Nov 7, 2019

The e2e is not passing because there is a problem with Ginkgo and go 1.13: onsi/ginkgo#602

In general when running test with go 1.13 you cannot call flag.Parse() in init() function: golang/go#34443 (comment)

We didn't have any problem with that previously because we executed our tests with go 1.12 but just 19ago the both form test infra updated our image for running e2e tests: https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/blame/e36eb04fdc6565d695a0086906ac5c92df7fb10b/config/jobs/kubernetes-sigs/service-catalog/service-catalog-presubmits.yaml#L49

I will revert that change ASAP because the ginkgo is currently not compatible with go 1.13

@mszostok
Copy link
Contributor

mszostok commented Nov 8, 2019

the e2e test failing because of problem described here: #2749 (comment)

this does not block the merging because provided fix is definitely valid.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 8, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: beautytiger, mszostok

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 8, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 5ce19c5 into kubernetes-retired:master Nov 8, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants